“‘It takes a village to raise a child’. The education or your children is the task of the community as a whole, not merely the province of teachers and local school administrators.”
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Since children and youngsters are the future of a nation, it is compulsory to find the best ways to educate them, and make them become proper citizens. The claim states that such an education can not be provided by teachers and schools but should involve the whole community. Although this vision is partly correct, the role of the teachers are eventually crucial to raise children.
There is no need to mention how the community,and especially the close relatives, play a major role in the growing up of a child. Indeed, family members are the most prone to teach their offsprings social conventions and proper manners before they go to school. The children must behave well to melt in the society they will live in. Despite schools surely provide academic education, it is not their primary function to watch the behaviours of the students. Furthermore, lessons will be understood and listened only if the families have taught the children to be quiet during classes.
However, this important role of the family in education should not belittle that of the schools. Parents can be source of bad behaviors for their children, if they are actually criminals or drug addicts for example. Thus, children will consider schools as haven where they can bloom, instead of the distressed situation at their home. On top of that, education is also giving career opportunities to every students, no matter they background. Spreading knowledge, that parents cannot provide, is an efficient mean to build promising futures for the children.
In relation with the former paragrah, schools consequently help children to integrate society. When family teaches how to behave, schools give away children the tools to face the big world. This is particularly illustrated by children of immigrant parents. If the latter often have issues to melt in the countries they just arrived, the former by going to school can help their parents' integration. In fact, the children can learn a new language quickly and will probably speak it at home, thus schools teach indirectly the newly arrived. Not to mention that children also bond easily with their conterparts, and consequently giving their parents opportunity to meet other parents.
In conclusion, if the education of children requires undoubtedly the community and espeacally the family, one should not forget the porwerful impact schools and teachers have on children, both preparing them to confront a competitive world, and sometimes teaching indirectly the parents as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 46, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
... is no need to mention how the community,and especially the close relatives, play a ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 44, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...conclusion, if the education of children requires undoubtedly the community and e...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2117.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 405.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22716049383 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7351115587 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 631.8 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.138979829 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.85 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.21951772744 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106321144827 0.243740707755 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0358058102032 0.0831039109588 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0224115081258 0.0758088955206 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0705222420277 0.150359130593 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246786403732 0.0667264976115 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.