Question authority. Only by questioning accepted wisdom can we advance our understanding of the world.
First of all, as to me, the field that questions the most authority and tries to understand our world is science. Indeed, scientists have always been carrying out experiments, writing reports of their discoveries, debating their theories to build a new vision of our universe and its components. In Europe, during the Middle-Ages, much scientists had to keep their experiments secret or at least, not to srpread them to the knowledge of everyone. For example, Italian astronomer Galileo Galilei still advocated Copernic's theory of the Solar System even if he had the evidence by observing the planets and the stars, before he resigned because the Church threatened his life. Obviously Galileo is a brave character, that supports that science should question our world.
Rebellion against authority also relates to questioning poitical regimes. If criticizing dictatorial regimes is rather easy, given the obvious violation of basic human rights and aggressive methods of repression, questioning our so-called democracies is somewhat more difficult, but should not be look down upon. Democracy states that everyone should have a word to say, and that everyone is equal legally speaking. However, our political systems may certainly be not so ideal and we should not stop scrutinize diligently whether the political people infringe on our rights and on the rights of the underpriviledged. That is why I think this recommendation is pretty suitable to politics and that we can all benefit from political awareness.
Finally, wars demand people to be conscious and woke towars the orders they are given. If not, it could lead to horrible deeds and crimes against humanity. For instance, so as not to commit the same crime, a German soldier can disobey the order if he thinks it is against moral values. However, questioning the orders could also prevent the army from winning the battle against the enemy because some actions were not carried out.
In conclusion, questioning is a fundamental concept in our lives, as people living a complex universe, as citizens living in democracies or as possible soldiers in wars to come. Most of time, it is beneficial to be aware and to take off our blinkers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 332, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...nts. In Europe, during the Middle-Ages, much scientists had to keep their experiment...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, look, may, so, still, as to, at least, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1849.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 356.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19382022472 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85898622497 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606741573034 0.4932671777 123% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4222200376 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.5625 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 5.21951772744 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214428070418 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068177877402 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712952922727 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116315216957 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386670944952 0.0667264976115 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.