Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
As many countries in the world are democratic regimes, citizens of those countries live under laws that were discussed thoroughly in high instances of the State, such as the Congress in the Unioted States, where those texts were normally assessed about their effectiveness and their fairness. The claim points out the individual initiative of awareness and resistance in case the former process was not carefully thought and I truly support this stance.
Indeed, as we are individuals, endowed with the right to vote, we have the responsibility, if not the duty, to watch out carefully what laws are passed or signed and scrutinize if they do not infringe on our fundamental rights. For instance, the disciminating Muslim Ban targeted at some visitors of the Middle-East to the United States hinder the right to travel freely. Hence the quick outcry that emerged on the social media to protest against this decree.
However, you may ask, when should we protest and resist ? What are "just laws" ? Justice is when no one or the least possible number of people suffer from the laws. As a matter of fact, if we belonged to the priviledged class, we are not aware of our position and the unfairness of some laws that benefit to us at the sake of other people, such as the aristocracy in Europe during the monarchies and empires and White people during segregation in the United States. Are we in that case, then I would recommend that we have to look for what is unfair in our country by reading books, listening to testimonies of the underpriviledged and fight for their sake. Because all citizens should be equals in front of law.
Nevertheless, could I be argued, what is the regime is dictatorial and repress harshly the opponent ? Should we still disobey ? This is truly more complex issue. If you are aware of this situation, then blatant disobeyance is surely not the best solution, since the regime will probably arrest you and silent you, and your action will be of no avail. Fortunately, brave people will find enough courage to fight for their ideals and for the common good, for instance Rosa Parks that refused to let her seat to protest the prejudiced condition of minorities.
In conclusion, citizens of democratic regimes should carefully assess the fairness of their passed laws and resist if they are not enough. On the other hand, we must also abide by the law that build the safety and the stability of the country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 373, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ates hinder the right to travel freely. Hence the quick outcry that emerged on the so...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 669, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...erpriviledged and fight for their sake. Because all citizens should be equals in front ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, still, then, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2033.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 417.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87529976019 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68080433418 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544364508393 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 638.1 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.2527758778 60.3974514979 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.944444444 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.21951772744 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131593389962 0.243740707755 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0418192785612 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447126969342 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0681009638781 0.150359130593 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030874129021 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.8971910112 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.