Knowing about the past cannot help people make important decision about today
As much as I would love to agree with the statement "knowing about the past cannot help people make important decisions today", I would only do so partially. This statement is highly contextual and below, I would make you understand when the statement would be true and when it won't hold waters.
There are situations we find ourselves in life that we need to utilise our padt. Be it our mistakes or right actions. Imagine a man who in times past was duped because he had paucity of information about a particular Agricultural business he ventured into. After the bad experience,the man decided to study further in Agricultural businesses. This shows that the man gained more knowledge through his past mistake.
Considering the situation stated above, the man decided to venture into the business once again. After a while,he met some people who wants to take advantage of him. As a wise man, he simply looks at them and tells himself "never again". He made a vow never to fall into such trap again. This scenario made us know that sometimes your past can help you make better decisions today.
However, some situations will warrant that you don't dwell on your past in order to forge ahead in your present bringing about a better future. Take for example a lady who was once raped and maltreated by her uncle for several years before she finally gained freedom. A time came in her life when she got married. After this, she is expected to enjoy conjugal bliss but unfortunately she deprived herself of this. Instead of enjoying her marriage, she kept remembering her past. This took a toll on her present relationship with her husband. For her to make sound and importance decision today of fully accepting her husband's love, she has to let go of her past.
Therefore, the ability of a man to take his past as a lesson and use it to make way for a better present and brighter tomorrow is dependent on the individual involved. It's a matter of choice to allow your past debar you from making better decisions today or to push you to making the best decision today.
In conclusion, the statement " knowing about the past cannot help people make decision about today" is highly contextual. It should therefore be considered with respect to the situation at hand.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
... ventured into. After the bad experience,the man decided to study further in Agricul...
^^^^
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , he
...o the business once again. After a while,he met some people who wants to take advan...
^^^
Line 5, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e simply looks at them and tells himself 'never again'. He made a vow n...
^^
Line 7, column 48, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
..., some situations will warrant that you dont dwell on your past in order to forge ah...
^^^^
Line 9, column 169, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...s dependent on the individual involved. Its a matter of choice to allow your past d...
^^^
Line 11, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...out today' is highly contextual. It should therefore be considered with resp...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, look, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 33.0505617978 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1909.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 396.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82070707071 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67238420384 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54797979798 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7380284351 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2173913043 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82608695652 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3698114343 0.243740707755 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0957062744577 0.0831039109588 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157270500752 0.0758088955206 207% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21899516208 0.150359130593 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137808482438 0.0667264976115 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 14.1392134831 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.