Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.
The statement declares that knowing about the past events will not help people to make better decisions, however I think studying history and become informed about previous events have many advantages and help people gain more experience and confidence that eventually help them make correct decisions.
First, Knowing about the history and the steps governments and people took in their life, make one familiar with the mistakes they did and, help them not to repeat these mistakes again. In other words, people can learn a lot reading the history, they can enhance their experience and learn the methods our ancestors had applied to overcome the problems. For example consider the prehistoric dams which have been constructed on rivers thousands years ago, later people saw these structures and tried to construct similar structure with higher functionality which control the flow of water. This process of watching the history of these structure and trying to improve their functionality in the newer ones have leaded to the modern dams which not only do their initial functionality but also generate electricity. Hence studying old inventions and being familiar with their logics can highly help people in their present life.
Furthermore, knowing about the past and finding out that, people in the past also did many similar mistakes, can help people increase their confidence toward facing their problems. They become aware that, they are not the only ones who did these mistakes and, as people in the past overcome these problem by hard work, they can solve these problems too.
Another thing to mention is about the information which are gained through studying history. This can be a way for the people of a country to become familiar with their glorious history and, motivate them to try harder to repeat their success and fame. For example, people in china has a honorable history, relying on this rich history, Chinese people try hard to regain their great position again.
Admittedly, the condition of present time is not exactly the same as in the past, in this regard all the method and experiences of past people cannot be repeated precisely, however they can be a starting point to know the issues better and become motivated to find required solution.
In conclusion, in contrast to the claim of the statement, I think knowing about the past can help people a lot in understanding their problems better and use the experience of the past people to better solve the present problems, Also becoming aware about the honorable history of their country may increase the motivations of the citizens of a country and make them more confident about following their plans.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 813, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ionality but also generate electricity. Hence studying old inventions and being famil...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this problem' or 'these problems'?
Suggestion: this problem; these problems
...kes and, as people in the past overcome these problem by hard work, they can solve these prob...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 287, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... fame. For example, people in china has a honorable history, relying on this rich...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, another thing, for example, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, in contrast to, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2248.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 441.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09750566893 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49844435122 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453514739229 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 692.1 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.9155840771 60.3974514979 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 172.923076923 118.986275619 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.9230769231 23.4991977007 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9230769231 5.21951772744 228% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285020847398 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119223593404 0.0831039109588 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103374065526 0.0758088955206 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189015256952 0.150359130593 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841623642352 0.0667264976115 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 14.1392134831 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 48.8420337079 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.8971910112 147% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.