Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Clever learn from past mistakes, knowing about the past mistakes and working on them increases the rate of success. In my not so humble opinion, I mostly disagree with the statement that known about the past cannot help to make important decision today.
To begin with, knowing about the past can safe lots of time and one can tackle that problem with different approach. It is always said that learn from the past mistakes, it mean that don’t repeat the past mistake in feature. Every human on this planet makes mistakes it is blatant we are not machine but only wise person work on his past mistake analyze it avoid it in feature. For instance, one can exemplify when terrorist attack on Tej Hotel in Mumbai taking sea way from that situation Indian government has taken major action by increasing the security on that side and due to this many further attacks was avoided from sea side. If Indian government would not have work on past and analyze there would have been more terrorist attack from that side.
Further, sometimes analyzing past help us to save more time which can be invest on other stuff. For instance Thomas Edison who invented light bulb experience debacle at the beginning by performs thousand failed experiment before inventing first and actual light bulb. If he would have never analyze his mistake before making another try he would have end up doing same mistake and light bulb would have never invented. This is the best example to show why we should analyze the past and work accordingly in present.
Finally, while making important decision in present if we do not consider past than it may exacerbate the situation. It is apt to focus only on present without knowing the past; it might erroneous decision to make. For instance, in this situation of Covid pandemic many states or country do not go under the state of lock down which result in more cases in that area, and it did not stop their when they announce lock down after few months they again release the lock down which exacerbate the situation by burgeoning more number of Covid victims. If they would have analyze the past than they would have kept more patient before release the lock down which would have saved more number of lives.
In conclusion, knowing about past mistakes help us to analyze the situation so we can approach that problem with different solution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'means'?
Suggestion: means
...d that learn from the past mistakes, it mean that don’t repeat the past mistake in f...
^^^^
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'avoids'?
Suggestion: avoids
...son work on his past mistake analyze it avoid it in feature. For instance, one can ex...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...ce debacle at the beginning by performs thousand failed experiment before inventing firs...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 292, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'analyzed'.
Suggestion: analyzed
...tual light bulb. If he would have never analyze his mistake before making another try h...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 549, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...urgeoning more number of Covid victims. If they would have analyze the past than t...
^^
Line 7, column 568, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'analyzed'.
Suggestion: analyzed
...er of Covid victims. If they would have analyze the past than they would have kept more...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 698, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... would have saved more number of lives. In conclusion, knowing about past mistak...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, finally, first, if, may, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1966.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 410.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79512195122 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23204182486 2.79657885939 80% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50243902439 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2167001316 60.3974514979 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.875 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170898286332 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723253760839 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646357690126 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120643500748 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680653547043 0.0667264976115 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.