Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
An organization/institution/government has its foundation laid on a certain set of rules or laws that everyone is expected to accept and abide by. These laws have to be common for all, and giving latitude to anyone as an exception can lead to the exploitation of the principles on which the institution stands. Law-makers are the protectors of the strictures with respect to the framework of the governing body. I completely disagree with the above statement that laws should be flexible under any circumstance, time, or place.
Firstly, the laws are made taking care of the symbiotic relationship with the people for whom the laws are made. Any law incorporated globally is framed according to the participating countries and is not only pertinent to a specific territory or region. For instance, if any country wishes to adopt a nuclear technology even for power and energy generation, they have to abide by the global norms framed for such reasons. This law came into force after the Hiroshima-Nagasaki incident when the US dropped a nuclear bomb on Japanese land during World War II, leading to mass destruction and catastrophic effects. To maintain the world’s peace, these sets of rules were implemented for the protection of humanity. Hence, it is necessary to have stringent rules that curtail flexibility and are uniform.
Secondly, laws are made for the development of the human race but due to few people taking advantage of their positions for personal good, it becomes arduous to protect the law. For instance, India, the country which is striving to take down its name from the list of developing nations and thriving to make its place among the developed ones, is currently struggling with its legal system. The constitution of India is convoluted and the extent to which the laws are incorporated is negligible. One of the reasons for the country’s slow growth is corruption. The need is to make stringent anti-corruption policies and to keep a check on the leniency of the government or its officials, which does not abide by the laws in fear of abduction of its power to govern.
On the other hand, the Indian government has been flexible in making laws for the LGBTQI community. Homosexuality, in India, was considered a taboo and against the law. With the changing times, India has accepted the LGBTQI community and has amended the laws to protect it. Hence, it is important to amend the laws as per the changing times and needs which focuses on a bigger aspect and not to special cases pertaining to time, circumstance, or place by abiding by the law.
In conclusion, the laws are made taking care of the concerned people and for the protection of humanity as a whole. The development of any institution/nation/organization is contingent on how the laws are formulated and followed and if required, are amended.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 323, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...hich the institution stands. Law-makers are the protectors of the strictures with r...
^^^
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...e development of the human race but due to few people taking advantage of their po...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2367.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 474.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99367088608 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42020082495 2.79657885939 122% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504219409283 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 758.7 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.703442996 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.714285714 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249909924259 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798674424261 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569102552452 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147279710409 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427165637115 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.