Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In an ideal Judiciary system, every innocent person should be proven innocent and every criminal should get indicted. Despite being a lot of iterations and amendments in the laws, yet no country is able to achieve the ideal state. However, our aim should be to reach as close as possible. Now, this breaks into two scenarios. Firstly, every criminal gets indicted but sometimes an innocent man also wrongly gets convicted too. Secondly, an innocent person never gets convicted even if that means sometimes a criminal also gets a green card. Hence, out of these two states, every country has to choose what condition they want to be in and laws should be designed to accommodate that. Therefore, the laws should be flexible or strict depends upon the above-mentioned idealogy of the country. Below are the main ideas behind my thesis.
For the first scenario, the laws are needed to strict and narrow so that no criminal gets out of the judiciary system. Therefore, laws cannot be flexible to take into account various scenarios because if they are, criminals can use flexibilities to mislead the court. For instance, an eye witness confessed against a criminal that he or she saw this particular person committing murder. Now, if the laws say that at least 2 eye witness is required to remove the possibility of human errors, lawyers can use this loophole to save his or her client. Hence, laws are need to strict and focussed if the goal is to catch all the criminals.
For the second scenario, the laws are needed to be flexible enough so that an innocent person gets a complete opportunity to prove his or her innocence. For instance, in the earlier case, what if that particular eye witness has some deep-seated ill-will towards the man in conviction. In that case, the eye witness can utilize this chance to take revenge on him or her. Hence, in that case, laws are needed to be flexible to consider all the circumstances, times, and places so that an innocent man never gets wrongly convicted.
In conclusion, I think there is a very fine line between the flexibility and strictness and area of flexibility or strictness should be decided on what a country believes about the purpose of law since it is practically impossible to achieve the ideal scenario.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, at least, for instance, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1884.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 388.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85567010309 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68926966393 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489690721649 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9602133684 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1578947368 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4210526316 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.21951772744 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140405284834 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482748953078 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428705102613 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0937886216041 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0142095772895 0.0667264976115 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.