Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Some people might think that law should not applied depend on various circumstances, times, and places. However, I think law should be robust equally to every people without any consideration of their grounds.
Admittedly, people would agree that laws about abortion should be flexible to people based on the situations, times, and places. In the past, abortion is just a crime, even if pregnant is caused by a crime such as sexual abuse. People think that the fetus is kind of a life, and it has a right to live. However, because of the stress of mothers and increase in understanding their scars of sexual violence, many people started to think that it’s too cruel to victims to be responsible for the result of crimes and abolish the law that make abortion illegal especially when they got baby without their decision. Thus, laws like abortion should be changeable to depend on conditions, times, and places.
However, I think that laws like larceny, homicide, and traffic crime should be applied robustly and no needs to consider criminals’ situations, times, and places. Larceny, homicide, and traffic crime are the crime that give victims very significant impact on their lives, and they are the usual crimes that can be happened in our society. But we must think about the fact that there are many criminals who committed their crime for their lives, such as their poor economic conditions. When laws started to consider those reasons why they have to do crimes, the amount of punishment would be decreased compared to the regular appliance. Some might think that this is a chance to live differently so that they try to live legally, but some can think that they get an indulgence to commit a crime. For this reason, if laws start to consider criminals’ situations, laws could not be functioned as laws that restricted the nationers not to do the crime.
In conclusion, I think laws should not be adaptable to take consideration of different circumstances, times, and places because there are many victims who are suffering from side effect of crimes and laws that are connected to them. The government should make laws considerably to decrease the number of people who get pain from crimes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Some people might think that law should ...
^^^
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'apply'
Suggestion: apply
... people might think that law should not applied depend on various circumstances, times,...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ut any consideration of their grounds. Admittedly, people would agree that laws...
^^^
Line 2, column 262, Rule ID: KIND_OF_A[1]
Message: Don't include 'a' after a classification term. Use simply 'kind of'.
Suggestion: kind of
...l abuse. People think that the fetus is kind of a life, and it has a right to live. Howev...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pend on conditions, times, and places. However, I think that laws like larceny,...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted the nationers not to do the crime. In conclusion, I think laws should not b...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, thus, i think, in conclusion, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1837.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 372.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93817204301 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65525409721 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454301075269 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 560.7 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 11.0 1.77640449438 619% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7717241159 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.466666667 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53333333333 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123398934041 0.243740707755 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545274886382 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405848744143 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920774306838 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.014378858301 0.0667264976115 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.