Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
This topic raises the controversial issue of whether laws should be flexible to take some consideration of different cases or not. Indisputably, each lawsuit has its circumstances in terms of peoples, times and places. Nevertheless, laws can not expand to contain all different cases. Thus, I generally disagree with the opinion that laws should be flexible enough to take all circumstances and would argue that laws should be rigid to deter crimes as much as it can.
First of all, laws should be rigid in all its judgment. I would like to point out that the more rigid laws, the less crimes happen. To illustrate further, let us look at the example of someone is thinking about killing someone else. In this circumstance, if he thinks about the rigid punishment of spending the rest of his life into prison, he will not able to do like a crime. On the other hand, if he thinks that he can get a justification by law to escape from the punishment, this may encourage him to kill that person. It is pretty obvious that rigid laws will prevent most of crimes.
Furthermore, how can we reach to laws that take into account all circumstances? There are millions of billions cases. Each one has different circumstances. People who make laws usually take into the consideration the worst case in such a crime. I would argue that if laws should be flexible enough as the statement recommend, there would be many escapes by law for criminals in all cases.
Admittedly, there are some cases that many circumstances should be taken into account. In such these cases, judge is the person who can apply laws in the right way. The judge gives his judgement based on a good study on the case. the judge takes into account different circumstances, times and places. However, the statement doesn't constitute sufficient evidence to claim how can laws be flexible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to deter crimes as much as it can. First of all, laws should be rigid in al...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun crimes is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...point out that the more rigid laws, the less crimes happen. To illustrate further, l...
^^^^
Line 3, column 581, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the crimes') or simply say ''most crimes''.
Suggestion: most of the crimes; most crimes
...ty obvious that rigid laws will prevent most of crimes. Furthermore, how can we reach t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...id laws will prevent most of crimes. Furthermore, how can we reach to laws th...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s by law for criminals in all cases. Admittedly, there are some cases that ma...
^^^^
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ment based on a good study on the case. the judge takes into account different circ...
^^^
Line 7, column 330, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...imes and places. However, the statement doesnt constitute sufficient evidence to claim...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, thus, first of all, in all cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 320.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.809375 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77005295245 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515625 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 704.065955056 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8032736678 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.95 118.986275619 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.65 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196192109649 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645888724167 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654024022202 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142257119033 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671349164374 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 14.1392134831 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.