Laws should not be rigid or fixed. Instead, they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
Human nature is abberarnt, every human in this world beholds a reckless way of doing things. If such behaviour is not controlled we can create chaos and havoc in the society and laws are a way to do it. Laws are boundation and minimum conditions about how a person should act in a place or a situation. Laws put a constraint on the recklessness of human nature. Hence laws are a basic need to smooth running of the society but we cannot define a law for all situation rigidly since all situation are different and all actions are taken in different cicumstances and one cannot outlook the conditions in which this action is done.
We can define one law for a particular action, but we cannot fix the punishment for every situation resulting in the same action. For instance a law states that in a case there is a person being murdered by another person, the other person is hanged to death but we cannot stick to this all in the cases because even in our experience we have encountered various cases in which a murder was done deliberlatly, when the murder was done as an act of revenge while there can be certain cases in which the death of the person was unintensional or in the act of defence. Thus in such cases where the circumstances leading to the same result where not same, we cannot fix a particular law for all cases and punishment should be after taking into account of various circumstance, time and place. Another instance in India public display of affection like kissing is banned and is punishable according to law, now a couple from New York where such display of affection is not under law naive of Indian laws must not punished instead they should be warned and first a knowledge of certains laws should be given to them. Clearly place, time and circumstances are a major reason on which a particular law should be based.
Our world has moved forwards from the time the first drafts of laws were made and many amendments according to the situations have been made from thereafter and new laws have been introduced. When population rise was not a problem there was no law which stops us from having any number of children but today as the population rise is a problem we need to make our laws to slow the population growth hence restircting the number of children we can have. Now in chnia such laws are present that one can give birth to one child but in case of multiple birth we cannot give up the second child or kill the child hence we need to take account of situation while applying the law on that couple. Also now consider this law has been previling and we have seen a constant decline in the world population over many years now as this law is not neccessary anymore it can be lifted or due to major climatic disaster there was an instant population decline we can lift the law instantly. Thus circumstances and the need of law plays a very important role and we cannot overlook this.
Conclusively we can say that laws are a basic needs of better functioning of the society and we need to have strong rules to control the reckless behavior of people but we need to take into account about various possible cases in accordance to the law and these laws should be flexible enough for fitting into situations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 363, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...nt on the recklessness of human nature. Hence laws are a basic need to smooth running...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 567, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...unintensional or in the act of defence. Thus in such cases where the circumstances l...
^^^^
Line 5, column 691, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... while applying the law on that couple. Also now consider this law has been previlin...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, look, second, so, thus, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 19.5258426966 184% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 28.0 12.4196629213 225% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2660.0 2235.4752809 119% => OK
No of words: 587.0 442.535393258 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53151618399 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9222030514 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54120322674 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.410562180579 0.4932671777 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 850.5 704.065955056 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 23.0359550562 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 105.545143629 60.3974514979 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.25 118.986275619 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.6875 23.4991977007 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.21951772744 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233848153557 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0900357280998 0.0831039109588 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767301860611 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161882786991 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0724759585075 0.0667264976115 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 14.1392134831 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.86 48.8420337079 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.59 12.1639044944 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 11.2143820225 146% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.