Laws should not be rigid or fixed. Instead, they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.

Laws are the set of rules and regulations which are formulated by the government in order to maintain peace and harmony in the country, state or society. All the laws must be followed, accepted and obeyed by the people of the society in order to live a conflict-free life. The laws enforced on the people should be without any distinction between them so that there would be uprightness served on everyone. If the laws are kept rigid and fixed, there would be observed a dominance in the country.

Since the whole society comes under one set of laws, it it the responsibility of the governing authority to make sure that the society is in concord with the regulations. Hence, it is necessary to consider all the needs and requirements of the society for a safe and secure living within the state or the country. Although these needs and requirements does not stay the same. The requirements or the rights of the people has kept changing along with various circumstances, times and places. For example, far earlier, it was the oldest son, or only the sons used to have the right over their family’s property. But ever since women have come upfront with the equality rights, things and the laws of the family’s finances and properties have changed. The laws have amended to contribute equal share of the property among the siblings or the family generation off-springs. Hence, the amendments of the laws should be flexible enough to make peace with the current circumstances.

Furthermore, the laws are different in multifarious places. Various places has distinct belief system, importance of lands, the indigenous’s strident beliefs, etc., and accordingly it is the responsibility of the government to into account all these terms while, or before assigning new rules or making the changes in the regulations. For examples, consider a holy place where there is holy tree of primordial age. The native strongly believes the tree to be holy incarnation and strictly against to cut it down. In such case, due to the people’s belief system, the government has to put on a law and tangible sign saying that it is illegal to cut the branches of the tree, or simply to carry any sharp weapon. Another example, consider a situation of a riot, the government is obligated to restrict the common to stay house arrest unless the riot is calmed down. A temporary curfew regulation is declared in such situations. Hence, it is recommended that for the sake of the society’s well being, the laws should be flexible and changeable according to the different circumstances and places.

However, the laws should not be changed with a click of a finger. In such a system, the importance of law is undermined. Instead, a propriety system should undergo detailed analysis and verification of the ongoing society’s standards and current situations, and accordingly formulate new laws, and make changes to the existing rules. If this practice is put into practical stage, it would easier for both, the society to accept and obey and the governing authority, to maintain a healthy and peaceful living within the society. Ultimately reaching to much a higher level of development of the nation.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 54, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: it
...le society comes under one set of laws, it it the responsibility of the governing aut...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 554, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...within the society. Ultimately reaching to much a higher level of development of t...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, well, while, as to, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 14.8657303371 209% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2679.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 533.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02626641651 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80487177365 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96824974802 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470919324578 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 837.9 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 15.0 4.99550561798 300% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8060355159 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.16 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.32 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268583653281 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783180651873 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0975705745868 0.0758088955206 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166294996662 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482636760239 0.0667264976115 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 100.480337079 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.