Leaders who are in significant positions of power should be democratically elected, not appointed.
the issue whether leaders should be elected democratically or be appointed is a contentious one. while each side has its strengths and weaknesses, I believe that Leaders should be democratically appointed, if democratically chosen, people will have faith on the leader and can run his or her team efficiently. Furthermore, electing the leader will make sure that the his or her team will flourish.
Firstly, electing a leader will make sure that the people, who elected the leader, will have faith in whatever step he or she may take. for example, mr. Modi was elected by the people of India as the Prime minister of India, now, whatever decisions he takes people have faith in him and will work towards the decision united and resulting in a better accomplishment. So, democratically selecting a leader will lead to better better condition.
Moreover, people will elect the leader who convinces majority of the people that why should he be elected. For instance, if there are two or more candidates fighting for becoming the leader, they would have to put better points, which benefits the population, in order to be elected as the leader. So, this competition will ensure that better efficient outcome is resulted.
lastly, some may argue that leader should be appointed, but by appointing the leader the efficiency of the government may decrease. To illustrate, if a military man is elected as a prime minister, he may take actions that are too strict for the people and may even aghast the people. So, this will reduce the faith in the leader.
in conclusion, if democratically elected, the leader would work more efficiently, people would have faith on the leader. For these reasons, a leader should be elected democratically.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the issue whether leaders should be elected...
^^^
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...y or be appointed is a contentious one. while each side has its strengths and weaknes...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 364, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'his'?
Suggestion: the; his
...electing the leader will make sure that the his or her team will flourish. Firstly, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...th in whatever step he or she may take. for example, mr. Modi was elected by the pe...
^^^
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: better
...tically selecting a leader will lead to better better condition. Moreover, people will ele...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Lastly
...etter efficient outcome is resulted. lastly, some may argue that leader should be a...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...will reduce the faith in the leader. in conclusion, if democratically elected, ...
^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ader should be elected democratically.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, lastly, may, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 58.6224719101 31% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 288.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06944444444 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91070819943 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 215.323595506 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482638888889 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.9493342074 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3333333333 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 5.21951772744 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348647104595 0.243740707755 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150722299404 0.0831039109588 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121446367063 0.0758088955206 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236754688395 0.150359130593 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712566879414 0.0667264976115 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 100.480337079 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.