The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The study of history leads us to the betterment of the current society. History shows people the problem they had in the past and the solution to that problem if the problem has been solved. If not solved, the study of those problems gives people the direction where the current status of the solution is leading. Most importantly, history gives the ways and/or methodologies that did not solve the problems and which ways the problem solved. The study of these leads to significantly faster and moving people towards the betterment of society.
History gives us the way of life humans had in the past and the improvement they have done to reach what they are and what they have today. If the study of history dispels from the fact the people are living differently today then that is not an appropriate study of history. From the study of history, it has been observed that humans' basic needs have not yet changed from the beginning. Those are still the same - food, clothes and shelter. We have just improved the modes of getting these basic needs. Improvements lead people to the need for the significant development we are seeing today.
More on that, in studies it has been discovered that the people who lived long ago were not so different from today. The people always looked at the past where they made the same error and make a decision that should not lead them on the same result. For example, when Thomas Edison was working on the electric resistance of the metal, he found some incredible properties of some metals. He found that not all metals have the same resistance for electricity. While doing so, he had found that when a specific amount of electricity flows through the metal, it illuminates. This helps him in the invention of the Bulbs people use today. While studying the metals, he found that some metal can not be used for the Bulbs and the study of metal helped him concluding it. People have a tendency to learn from mistakes and they have a tendency to improve on every iteration, the study of history proves it.
Hence, the main point of studying history is not to dispel the illusion of the people but to look at the mistakes those made in the past and improvement that had been done to get to what people are today. People are still the same people who lived in an earlier time but now with better technology and faster development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...what they are and what they have today. If the study of history dispels from the f...
^^
Line 9, column 752, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to conclude' or 'conclude'.
Suggestion: to conclude; conclude
...Bulbs and the study of metal helped him concluding it. People have a tendency to learn fro...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, look, so, still, then, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1959.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 420.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66428571429 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38269394544 2.79657885939 85% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.430952380952 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 613.8 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2256086907 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.2857142857 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.21951772744 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249058455342 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823916423071 0.0831039109588 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081247530143 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173601861769 0.150359130593 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731381124084 0.0667264976115 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 12.1639044944 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.