The need for people to search through the internet in order to find relevant information is tedious and may discourage the person to act on it or to raise their voice because it is tiresome.
The author claims that having the ability to sort through large quantities of information to find important information can make up for the shorter attention span to which I cannot agree completely. Consider the case of a nation where some parts are seeing a social revolution and another part is battered by a storm. With a lot of information about politician, movie or sports stars and information regarding scientific innovations flowing through the media, can either of the two issues be forgotten or be left to the discretion of people? It cannot be, and both the events require adequate attention in the media in order to help raise awareness among people who are already tired after their daily schedule.
The current day media is focussed on getting better ratings and viewership. To reach their goals they tend to choose topics which are sensational and ignore certain regions which they feel might not help them reach their goals. In India, the national media seldom covers details about floods in north-eastern states and are left for scrolling which needs a magnifying glass to look for. Only when people of those communities raise campaigns to fund the people affected through social media the real damage is known. Given that the abundance of information helps people address real issues which could have been engulfed by some sensational information making rounds.
The current technology has enabled the growth of media and has ensured that no important event is left out from coverage. But without being constantly reminded and discussed it is hard for people to notice the importance of an event after going through a mountain of information daily
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, regarding, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 309.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04854368932 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61622814771 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576051779935 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 704.065955056 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3220091969 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225432280009 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811785149008 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506458507526 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130408527433 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348877132769 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 100.480337079 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.