men and women, because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many task.
The author states whether men and women, because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many task. I disagree with authors claim that inherent physical differences make men and women to not pursue any particulat task or work.As in todays world men and women are working in different fields which were once assumed to be only men or women work for example womens were not involved in any wrestling or manufacturing industries before because they were considered to be weak in terms of physical capabilities but eventually with time when women entered the field they proved to be equally capable of completing the task and even in some accounts better.
The claim made by author referes also to men not being able to work for some task due to inherent physical differences but there is no such work that can not be done by men that women do in general except some natural phenomenas like giving birth etc women are always considered to be weak in terms of physical attributes in comparision to men but they have been proved wrong in almost all the fields today,
for an well known example Mary kom is one of the female boxers who is proved to be very talenteD in the field she has chosen she got olympics for her talent and proved tro be an example that men are capable to excel in physical task aswell, also we have womens who work as stunt women which was considered to be only done by men due to their physical strength such examples prove that inherent physical differences are not important the will to work hard and be dedicated is the key to any work to be done or get sucess in.
The world is growing towards equallity where men and women are considered to be equal for all jobs they are not judged by their inherent physical differences because they have made a stand in todays world by proving they are equally capable hence the above claim made by author does not make a point that can be accepted.
As there are no such examples to prove the statement made by the author right, as men and women may be different in terms of physical apperance but are capable of all the task provided to them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun task seems to be countable; consider using: 'many tasks'.
Suggestion: many tasks
... differences are not equally suited for many task. I disagree with authors claim that inh...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ces make men and women to not pursue any particulat task or work.As in todays wor...
^^
Line 1, column 254, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...not pursue any particulat task or work.As in todays world men and women are worki...
^^
Line 7, column 5, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...g in almost all the fields today, for an well known example Mary kom is one of t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, well, for example, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 19.5258426966 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1758.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 386.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55440414508 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35484105265 2.79657885939 84% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.417098445596 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 578.7 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 20.2370786517 25% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 77.0 23.0359550562 334% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 292.859283616 60.3974514979 485% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 351.6 118.986275619 295% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 77.2 23.4991977007 329% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 12.0 5.21951772744 230% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.458932135969 0.243740707755 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.376076550042 0.0831039109588 453% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.225397928703 0.0758088955206 297% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292269277433 0.150359130593 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125501974147 0.0667264976115 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 38.6 14.1392134831 273% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 1.78 48.8420337079 4% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 32.1 12.1743820225 264% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.29 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 100.480337079 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 29.0 11.8971910112 244% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 32.8 11.2143820225 292% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.