Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
Men and women are the essential components of the nature, and are regarded as the most intelligent creatures among the living beings due to the ability to use brain for carrying out most of the functions. The advent of mordernisation commensurates the development of human intellect, causing innovation of high power machineries operated by robots, and capable of high throughput productions. The prompt focuses that men and women are not equally fitted for many tasks due to the physical disparaties. It seems obvious on the first look, but meticulous observation of the subject matter leads the conclusion otherwise depending upon the task, either it is menial or machine operated.
First, the nature of the task varies according to the objectives of the firm (or industry); it runs-the-gamut from requiring extensive manual labour to the use of mental ability. The given prompt seems to be true in case of the former nature of the task (menial task), and the author might have overlooked the recent advances in the technology where most of the works are operated by machinaries and only mental ability ,or intellectual ability matters the most. The well-built structure of the body may seem an advantage for men for the higher chances of getting jobs requiring the heavy use of physical labour, but think about the software industry; Do they need the well-built body to release quality softwares? Obviously not.
Second, the circumstances of the people also make them fitted to the jobs. If you are in desperate need of the money, then automatically you will release out the extra energy to carry out most of the jobs -even requiring physical labour- and inherent body structure do not matters the most in this case. We can have plenty of instances where womens are involved in heavy physical workloads. Nature of the body depends upon how well you train your body. For instance, the body of Mary com, famous boxer of India, is not same as that of other ladies; it is not because she was born different, but she had practiced her body in a different way. When there is pecuniary need, women can carry heavier loads than a normal man, and the author's conclusion can be made unfounded.
Some may argue that the statistics shows most of the men are engaged in separate works than that of womens and so on. But, they have overlooked the data that is continuously changing. With the advent of mordernism and use of robotics and science, works requiring mental abilities is in higher demand than that of tradition menial works. If it was traditional society of India, where women were kept in detention within the four roof of the houses their inherent physical differences than that of men may have outcasted them from several opportunities, but the changing world has even changed this fact, where women build their body on gyms and acrobat centre.
In sum, it can be concluded that author showed myopic sense of sightedness to draw the conclusion which is unfounded in the present ever-changing society, which can be infered from the examples provided
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 416, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d by machinaries and only mental ability ,or intellectual ability matters the most...
^^
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: DONT_NEEDS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'matter'?
Suggestion: matter
...our- and inherent body structure do not matters the most in this case. We can have plen...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 623, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...fferent, but she had practiced her body in a different way. When there is pecuniary need, women ca...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 730, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...eavier loads than a normal man, and the authors conclusion can be made unfounded. Som...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...usion can be made unfounded. Some may argue that the statistics shows most of the m...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, second, so, then, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2541.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 515.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93398058252 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69263333846 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51067961165 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 801.9 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.77640449438 507% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.9213992376 60.3974514979 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.166666667 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6111111111 23.4991977007 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192301427625 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547507657522 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830145110424 0.0758088955206 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0970913377979 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0632377068088 0.0667264976115 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 100.480337079 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.