Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The orthodox believes and practicies that men are far superior to women in most ways has been proven to be a myth now. Yes, there is a basic physical difference between males and females, and the ideology that, earlier the physical and more intellectual task were well suited for men which is due to their physic and the hardship undergone through childhood. I strongly disagree with the prompt. As today the after the repeated revolution, women have proved to be equal and at par in every task.
The intial belief in this myth of men being superior to women was just brainstromed into young chilldren during those times so as that males would always enjoy the role of dominence over the women, as they knew that women would be much better at doing every other males' job. I do not particularly agree with this fact. For example, if a both a male and female child are put through same education, same preaching and trained for same jobs equally, both male and female child would prove to be qualified for performing the same task with efficacy. Yes, people migth argue here that it also depends on the intellectual and other aspects of the child as well, which might make them better qualified than the other candididate. The point here of comparision is that even if either of the gender kid is replaced by and ape with equal intellectual capability as humans, irrespective of the ape's gender it too will prove to be of same qualification as the other candidate.
In this 21st centuary, with the world still exploring the more and more capabilities that human posses, it is not that the pan is favouring any particular side of the gender. Additionally, since the awakning of the femenist revolution the long believed myth has been prove to be just a critical misconception day by day. Today, a child either male or female irrespective of gender can hope to fulfil his/her dream and the point of culmination in any given choice of their career, let it be sports, business, teaching, research, cooking, painting, etc. Men and women have been pro
In essence, I disagree with the statement saying just because of the inherent physical difference between males and females does not categories them to be suitable to do different tasks. Men too can cook properly, design clothes, and perform operations on other genders, and women to can perform the task as has heavy loading labour or a weight lifter in olympics, become soldiers and spy, and become a scientist. People may still not conform with this idea suggesting, as there is a huge physical difference between men and women, there lies sum tasks such as giving birth to a child which is only possible by women is the only exception case they have to support the idea of the prompt. But currently, in all other tasks it is a clearl fact today that both men and women can perform any given task.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 406, Rule ID: THE_EXACTLY_THE[1]
Message: Duplicated 'the' in the phrase: 'the after the'. Did you mean 'after the'?
Suggestion: after the
...ngly disagree with the prompt. As today the after the repeated revolution, women have proved ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 268, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'proved', 'proven'.
Suggestion: proved; proven
...olution the long believed myth has been prove to be just a critical misconception day...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 802, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n and women can perform any given task.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, still, well, as to, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2360.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 499.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72945891784 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55493024632 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486973947896 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 738.9 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.5922247959 60.3974514979 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.5 118.986275619 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1875 23.4991977007 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250257114057 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857322739084 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554626772785 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165101578282 0.150359130593 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0777310556735 0.0667264976115 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.75 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.