Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Men and women are two faces of a coin and are equally important in the society. Presence of one cannot eliminate the existence of other. They both have responsibilities and abilities. But it cannot be said that due to inherent physical differences women are not equally suited for many tasks.
Primarily, I would like to contend that in today's scenario, women are performing better than men whether it maybe politics, research, or any task that involves physical strength. For example, if we consider a physical task like wrestling (which was thought to be done only by men in ancient days), women are winning gold medals all over the world. Geeta Phogat, for India, won gold medal in wrestling. On the contrary, his brother could not perform good in wrestling. Also, in cricket (which involves a lot of physical strength) women are performing well across the world. They have taken this game to new heights.
Secondarily, I would like to back my point with other evidences where women are performing well than men. Indira Gandhi, former President of India, had a great knowledge of politics and perfromed great in her job. She did not perform less than any male president.
Additionally, I would like to mention that, god has given women capability to give birth to a child which requires a lot of physical strength and lot of pain tolerance power. Pain bore in giving birth to child is equivalent ot cracking of 32 bones at the same time according to a study. If a women can have this much of strength and pain tolerating power, I do not think any one would agree that females are not equally suited for many jobs.
On the contrary, I would like to say that, there may be some cases where female lack physical strength or we may say they have less strength than men; but these canbe some specific cases. There are also men who do not have much physical strength. These specific cases cannot be extrapolated to form a general view that women are physically weak and are not suited equally for all jobs.
Towards the end, I want to say that, there are many jobs across the globe. Both should be available for men and women equally because they both have different approach to tackle the problem. Physical strength of the body depends from person to person not from specific group of men to women. In some tasks, women can perform better than men and vice-versa. The ability to perform better must not be weighed with the ability to do a job.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 291, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a woman' or simply 'women'?
Suggestion: a woman; women
... the same time according to a study. If a women can have this much of strength and pain...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 293, Rule ID: WOMAN_WOMEN[1]
Message: 'woman' is the singular form of 'women'. Consider using 'woman'?
Suggestion: woman
...he same time according to a study. If a women can have this much of strength and pain...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 372, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...d pain tolerating power, I do not think any one would agree that females are not equall...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, second, so, well, for example, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2028.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 431.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70533642691 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44697207415 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477958236659 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4014005973 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9583333333 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232539394026 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697854905294 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647182346413 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131229109605 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553273366225 0.0667264976115 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 12.1639044944 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.