Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
Men are considered to be inherently physically stronger than women. This claim has been backed scientifically and thus it would be safe to assume that men are physically more adept to complete certain tasks than women.
In all sports requiring physical strength, there are different categories for male and female participants. This is primarily due to an inherent difference in strength. Also, in sports like athletics, where the results of men and women can be directly compared, it is clearly observed - say the 10th best male shot put athlete in the world can throw farther than the best female shot put athlete - that men perform far better than women. This is true for all the strength based sports, for example the a male batsman in cricket hits the ball harder than his female counterpart or a male footballer can produce more speed on the football.
When it comes to the corporate world, men are better suited for the on-site jobs on account of their superior physical prowess.
Therefore, as compared to the females that enroll in Civil or Mechanical disciplines of engineering, the number of male students in overbearingly high. On-site jobs involve difficult working conditions and physical hardships that women might not be able to endure and thus it is warranted for more men than women to take up these jobs. Certain private companies refuse to give these aforementioned jobs to women and rightly so as it would mean putting their health at risk and company would have to face the consequences.On the other hand, women are considered more suited for more subtle proffessions like art or designing. Thus more women than men take up fashion designing.
However, there are some women that refuse to accept the fact that they are inherently inferior to men in term of physicality and train very hard to prove others wrong. These efforts of these women should be considered and they must be evaluated accordingly while granting jobs or being compared to other men, as they might have exceeded the physical capabilities of a lot of men with their perseverance to prove themselves on the physical scale.
To conclude we can say that men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks. Thus their physical differences should be taken into account when assigning taks to them and making sure these tasks are not outside of their physical capabilities
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 499, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
... the strength based sports, for example the a male batsman in cricket hits the ball h...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 521, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...any would have to face the consequences.On the other hand, women are considered mo...
^^
Line 5, column 625, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...tle proffessions like art or designing. Thus more women than men take up fashion des...
^^^^
Line 8, column 129, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... are not equally suited for many tasks. Thus their physical differences should be ta...
^^^^
Line 8, column 292, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t outside of their physical capabilities
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, however, if, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2010.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 402.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69330590108 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495024875622 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.8139180835 60.3974514979 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402507033566 0.243740707755 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160665657403 0.0831039109588 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149881213232 0.0758088955206 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237090191024 0.150359130593 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114164392395 0.0667264976115 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.