The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyse the trends of its youth.
The statement that the most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyse the trends of its youth is very strong and might not always be true. There are many other ways by which one could understand contemporary culture. We will discuss the same in the further passage.
There are different religions and their traditions all over the world. Culture is one of the most essential aspects of an individual’s life. People belonging to different religions have different culture and traditions which they follow from years. Someone has said, “Time changes everything”, similarly with time these traditions and culture have also changed. For instance, in India there is a Hindu festival called Pola, in this festival, people worship Bull in their farms but in this world of contemporary culture, it is a bit different. Nowadays, there are Idols of these animals readily available in the market which are bought in the house and are worshipped of. In festivals like this, there is no place where the youngsters have any role to play. Thus giving importance to their trends will not help in understanding the contemporary culture.
Secondly, the cultural rituals and traditions are mostly followed by the elders and are taught to the youngsters. Thus, the elders contribute more towards the culture and teach the youth to do so. Every cultural ritual being conducted has its meaning which the elders understand more and if only they are successful in passing this knowledge correctly to the youths this ritual will not die in the future. For instance, in India Ganesh Chaturthi is one of the famous festivals celebrated with joy all over the world. In this people worship the idol of Lord Ganesh. Some youths misunderstand the tradition and make noise pollution by playing loud music on roads. Thus as the society, whether it be modern or old, constitutes of both the elders and youths - the analysis of only the youths trends will definitely not give a correct understanding of the culture in this contemporary world.
In contrast, sometimes studying the trends of the youths helps in understanding contemporary culture. The youngsters are the future of the country and studying their trends will give sound knowledge of the contemporary culture. For instance, Shiv Jayanti festival, on this day people worship the idol of Ruler Shivaji and remember their sacrifice in the freedom struggle. The way this festival is carried out by the youths is a bit different from what it was in the olden days. Nowadays the youths help the needy and poor on this day and provide them with some things which they feel are important for their living. By doing this good work they feel like they will make Shivaji Maharaj happy in the heaven. Thus studying the trends of the youths will give the knowledge of the transformations taking place in the contemporary culture.
In conclusion, yes it is an effective way to understand a contemporary culture by analysing the trends of its youth, but not the most effective ones. This modern society is made up of both elders and youths. Thus, a proper analysis will be to analyse the trends of both groups.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 520, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ebrated with joy all over the world. In this people worship the idol of Lord Ganesh....
^^^^
Line 3, column 662, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...llution by playing loud music on roads. Thus as the society, whether it be modern or...
^^^^
Line 3, column 712, Rule ID: CONSTITUTES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'consists of'?
Suggestion: consists of
...e society, whether it be modern or old, constitutes of both the elders and youths - the analys...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2626.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 527.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98292220114 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79129216042 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72094963555 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.430740037951 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 809.1 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.4636254205 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7857142857 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8214285714 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35714285714 5.21951772744 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.417376920498 0.243740707755 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124079064489 0.0831039109588 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.179037995577 0.0758088955206 236% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.322660503522 0.150359130593 215% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.179407489509 0.0667264976115 269% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.