The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Understanding contemporary culture is crucial to many businesses to provide intriguing services or products to their target customers. Hence, how to understand the recent culture in effective ways has been discussed for a long time, and analyzing the youth’s trends has been suggested as one of them. Although some reject the significance of youth’s impact on contemporary culture, it seems the most effective method to acquire information about contemporary culture.
Firstly, youth has the power to change their family culture, which means their impact on society is not confined to their similar age groups but also to older generations, their parent’s generation. For example, there is a new trend in Korea, which can be easily found on Instagram or other SNS: visit a beautifully decorated café, order a drink that seems authentic or unique, post on SNS, and communicate with others even with those who have never met. At first, this trend seems shared only in young groups, however, their parents started following the trend as well. Although they use different platforms such as Naver band, they do almost similar things. As it shows, the trend among young ages affected their parent generation, which indicates that analyzing trends of youth might imply not only the features of its generation’s but also of their parents’ generation. Hence, examining the trends of youth is beneficial to understand contemporary culture as it might include other generations’ features.
Secondly, young aged people are interested in many aspects of contemporary culture. While order aged groups tend to focus on their own interested areas, younger ages are more likely to search for various fields. For example, young students, in usual, have a strong interest in fashion: they are susceptible to trends and buy following the trends. Also, when many YouTubers uploaded cooking an egg with stirring up more than 1000 times, many young agers did the same thing and uploaded the videos on their SNS. Similar things happened not only in fashion and food but also in art, technology and others. It shows examining youth will be beneficial in understanding various aspects of contemporary culture.
To sum up, analyzing trends of youth is the most effective way to understand contemporary culture. However, it does not necessarily mean youth is the only possible source to understand contemporary culture. Through the trends of youth, analysts can understand the trends not confined in young agers but shared with order generations and examine various aspects of contemporary culture.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: BUY_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'by'?
Suggestion: by
...ion: they are susceptible to trends and buy following the trends. Also, when many Y...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, for example, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2184.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 408.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35294117647 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82567214277 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517156862745 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 666.0 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0438789133 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.333333333 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61111111111 5.21951772744 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212943272144 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799307520643 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664068434585 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154495943921 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613358291285 0.0667264976115 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.