In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The statement that imagination is of more importance than knowledge has been a bone of contention in recent times. The ability of the human mind to envision things is inexplicable and remains a mystery. For instance, a civil engineer without lifting a spade is able to envision the construction of a skyscraper with the exact dimensions and positions of its components. Likewise, a professor of Physics envisions the abstract concept of gravity and its effect on the trajectories of bodies in the solar system and elsewhere in the universe. These examples and more underscore the importance of imagination in any given academic field and the importance can never be overemphasized.
The statement tends to exaggerate the role of imagination in a majority of professions and academic fields. it asserts that imagination contributes more to the advancement of these fields than knowledge. looking back at the introduction, one could argue that without imagination that the civil engineer and the Physicist would not be able to envisage things. Hence, leads to a retarded growth and development in these fields.
However, in spite of the many assertions which favor imagination with respect to this contentious statement, knowledge remains of a greater value than imagination in the advancement of a majority of professions and academic fields.
Knowledge is the basis of learning. The civil engineer and the physics professor first acquired knowledge in their fields through education and experience to become experts in these fields. It is after one has had a basic knowledge of one's field of interest that one's imagination becomes clear and well explored. For example, without knowledge, a layman will be able to envisage the construction of a skyscraper but will lack clarity and accuracy of its components and dimensions. Conversely, the opposite would be the case with a civil engineer who has acquired the requisite knowledge of the field.
Similarly, the professor of physics applies his acquired knowledge and expertise in aerodynamics in the design of man-made flying bodies such as airplanes, rockets, and space jets. Imagination alone, irrespective of how vivid it might be, would never be adequate in the design of the body and the principle of operation of these flying bodies.
In contrast to the statement, Knowledge enhances imagination. Consider renowned scientists, the likes of Albert Einstein, Isaac Newton, Marrie Currie, e.t.c. how they made groundbreaking discoveries by enhancing their imaginations on the basis of the theoretical and practical skills they had acquired over time. These theoretical and practical skills are what distinguish experts from laymen.
In conclusion, notwithstanding the ability of man's imagination, knowledge is required for its clarity and enhancement
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 108, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ity of professions and academic fields. it asserts that imagination contributes mo...
^^
Line 2, column 204, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Looking
...ncement of these fields than knowledge. looking back at the introduction, one could arg...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 236, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... after one has had a basic knowledge of ones field of interest that ones imagination...
^^^^
Line 7, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...agination, knowledge is required for its clarity and enhancement
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, hence, however, if, likewise, look, similarly, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, in contrast to, in spite of, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 12.9106741573 232% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2375.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 436.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44724770642 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15423848082 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477064220183 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 761.4 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5809170181 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.095238095 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7619047619 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.21951772744 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199238636793 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641995839113 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590703102541 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100530497351 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623699823539 0.0667264976115 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.