In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge.
The Imagination and knoweldge is used to pursue profession, knowledge is something can be acquired, and imagination is something which can be develop but can’t transfer human to human. It’s actually depends on child hood and profession of person. Every field required some kind of knowledge and imaginations.
It’s depends on profession and your academics how you good at imagination and knowledge. It has been seen that the perfect balance between imagination and knowledge will make you profound in your academics and professional life. Every field required both things, but percentage may vary according to profession. Let me give one example: a computer programmer must be good at logic and math which resembles knowledge and computer programmer also have some level of imagination for creating User interface. Having perfect balance between knowledge and imagination make a person king of their field. If we take about profession like building architecture, he/she must have good imagination and knowledge as well. But prefer to have good imagination skills.
Moreover, imagination helps you to create something new, like creating a new design for the water bottle and knowledge will help to understand dimensions of the bottle. Both skills are independent to the each other. But independence depend upon the profession. It’s completely unjustifiable to say that most of profession and academic fields required imagination over knowledge. The knowledge helps you to implement static things and imagination helps use to create with helps of knowledge.The more you interact them with each other, more your work will become seemless.
In conclusion: It’s completely wrong to say that imagination is more important than knowledge, they both independant each other. It’s just like car can’t move without having four wheels. So having knowledge is as important as having creativity in any profession and academics.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... new, like creating a new design for the water bottle and knowledge will help to ...
^^
Line 5, column 459, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ent static things and imagination helps use to create with helps of knowledge.The m...
^^^
Line 5, column 497, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...s use to create with helps of knowledge.The more you interact them with each other,...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, may, moreover, so, well, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 296.0 442.535393258 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60472972973 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03713773552 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530405405405 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.2120503465 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1666666667 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4444444444 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270444729284 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895370454988 0.0831039109588 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0965390772147 0.0758088955206 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161894290574 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532973628721 0.0667264976115 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 48.8420337079 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 100.480337079 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.