A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The most appropriate curriculum which should be implemented at schools was always a controversial issue on the realm of the educations. A vast portion of academics assert that a national curriculum is a necessity in order each nation to fulfill its educative strategy. On the other hand, prominent academics on the field of education contend that the curriculum should be more flexible and me modified with rensobility of the directors who are the most appropriate people to detect its flaws. It is my personal belief that a natiolal curriculum should be implememted at schools in order students have a standard and adequate level of knowledge.
It would be naive for someone to ignore the importance of the flexibility on the implementation of the curriculum. When the director has the authority to apply some changes in order to make the curriculum more beneficial for the students, the outcome probably would be postive as this modified curriculum is enarmonized with the weaknesses of the students or the special needs of each area. For instance, the students of Greek islands possibly will need more courses for the upcoming methods in the protection of the sea enviroment in comparison with the students in Athens.
On the other hand, a national curriculum promotes a common standard of knowledge. This is very important, as each curriculum is a part of a broaden national strategy on the realm of education. This strategy is out of the the authority of a director and it is scratched on the highest level of administration. For instance, five yeras before, the European Comission published a syrvey which is took place at the states of European Union and the main outcome was the lack of knowledge in European students about the European history and European integity. Thus, the European Parlament voted a legislature which urged the state-members to increase the teaching hours of European history at schools.
To conclude up, albeit the flexibility in the modification of curriculum at school in some cases is indeed beneficial, it is more crucial the implementation of a national curriculum in order each nation to fulfill its targets for the education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ortant, as each curriculum is a part of a broaden national strategy on the realm of educa...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...m of education. This strategy is out of the the authority of a director and it is scrat...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...m of education. This strategy is out of the the authority of a director and it is scrat...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'taken'.
Suggestion: taken
...n Comission published a syrvey which is took place at the states of European Union a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, thus, for instance, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 355.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10422535211 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06193943774 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 215.323595506 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450704225352 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 590.4 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6220839908 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.384615385 118.986275619 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3076923077 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07692307692 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157866518798 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652335038706 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372037675082 0.0758088955206 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106344440682 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246471245551 0.0667264976115 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 48.8420337079 73% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.