Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Τhe ideal remaining for a position with high responsibilities is nowadays a controversial issue. Many experts assert that these people should be replaced periodically in order a fresh air to inspire their organizations. On the other hand, an important portion of people claim that these organizations need stability and this can only be achieved by a long-year leadership of a person. It is my personal belief that individuals who possess crucial positions should be replaced after a specific service as a revitalization is necessary for the organizations which they lead on.
However, it would be naïve for someone to deny the actual benefits for a steady leadership. The humans who are in these positions are charismatic, they are very skilled and present such a versatility and flexibility which makes them to seem vital for their organization. For instance, the public would make it hard to realize that Mark Zuckerberg, the inventor of facebook,should be replaced for the refreshment of his company as he is so young and innovative that expunge such notions.
In contradiction with the above paragraph, it is considered crucial for organizations to be refreshed and revitalized by replacing the superior. Organizations should be looking forward for innovative policies which make them to thrive across the years. New persons with well-equipped biography should be preferred in these organizations as they depict the refreshment . For example, the head of the European Comission is re-elected every five years as European Union desires people with fresh energy and new ideas.
Moreover, each person who possess a high - responsibility position faces every day so many perplexed conditions that make it very difficult for someone to sustain such a stress for many years.
To conclude up, the replacement of the high-ranking employees in organizations and enterprises is crucial for the stretching of new policies which make them to thrive in a very competitive environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Τhe ideal remaining for a position with ...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the organizations which they lead on. However, it would be naïve for someone t...
^^^
Line 2, column 375, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , should
...ark Zuckerberg, the inventor of facebook,should be replaced for the refreshment of his ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... innovative that expunge such notions. In contradiction with the above paragrap...
^^^
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nizations as they depict the refreshment . For example, the head of the European C...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eople with fresh energy and new ideas. Moreover, each person who possess a high...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... sustain such a stress for many years. To conclude up, the replacement of the h...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 311.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38263665595 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29339512183 2.79657885939 118% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533762057878 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3760430462 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.769230769 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9230769231 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144741784913 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608152891971 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0200059367126 0.0758088955206 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0872340615381 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224254007577 0.0667264976115 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.