A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Students are encouraged to develop a well-rounded education that can ultimately prepare them for the vast globalization of the world. Therefore, it is crucial that students have access to learning a variety of subjects that may interest them and expand their skill set. If students were to learn the same exact curriculum, it prevents them from expanding their knowledge, skills, and uniqueness. Hence, I disagree that students should study the same national curriculum until they enter college, as it would not only be disadvantageous to students, but also they global community.
Studying the same national curriculum hinders students' ability to expand knowledge and skills needed for a globalizing society. The general subjects of math, history, ans science prepares students for the basic concepts of the world: such as how to count money, how to understand history's role in current events, and how to investigate with scientific tools. While the set of knowledge provided by a generic nation curriculum serves some benefit, it does not fully prepare students for a vast number of situations in a world that is apt to change. Therefore, students must be able to study other subjects that do serve purpose in expanding their knowledge, such as psychology and the culinary arts. These subjects not only prepare students with knowledge on how to interact with people and how to cook food, but also prepare them for a college's open range of studies. Thus, adopting the position to have the same national curriculum would impede students from expanding their knowledge and skill set.
On the other hand, adopting the same national curriculum would limit the asset of uniqueness in students. When applying for college, students will be equally prepared to enter, since they have studied the same subjects and material that prepared them for admissions. However, because students learned the same curriculum, all students applying to college will have the same application of courses taken. College applications are looking for students who have taken different courses and gained a well-rounded education, which will prepare them for college's range of studies. Therefore, if students all have the same application, none will stand out for college. Thus, implementing the same national curriculum prevents students from being unique in applying to college.
Likewise, because unique personalities are limited with the same national curriculum, students applying to college may be applying for the same subjects of math, history, or science. For instance, all students applying to be mathematicians, historians, or doctors may serve some some benefit in society. However, if all students were to be mathematicians, historians, or doctors, then it thwarts diversity in the workforce. While the world may need more mathematicians and doctors, it creates an imbalance. Because the world is constantly changing by the minute with the rise of technology and changes in social dynamics, we may be looking for more people with knowledge in computer science. Therefore, students studying the same national curriculum would only have access to generic fields of study and jobs, while avoiding other jobs that are equally important in the world.
In conclusion, it is vital that students do not study the same national curriculum as it would limit their knowledge, skill set, and uniqueness in a world that continues to change and look for more diverse individuals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 582, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...udents, but also they global community. Studying the same national curriculum hi...
^^^
Line 4, column 274, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: some
...cians, historians, or doctors may serve some some benefit in society. However, if all stu...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, likewise, look, may, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, of course, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2912.0 2235.4752809 130% => OK
No of words: 544.0 442.535393258 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35294117647 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82947280553 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85100753149 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.408088235294 0.4932671777 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 906.3 704.065955056 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 12.0 3.10617977528 386% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6735647759 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.608695652 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.652173913 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86956521739 5.21951772744 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281750266838 0.243740707755 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105442543706 0.0831039109588 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614173563748 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182531857565 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325659119907 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.