A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
There is always a thought in school students about why they cannot have a curriculum that prioritize their interest and also inarticulately express criticism towards a common study plan. The prompt describes about the uniformity of method of study every school in a nation must follow. However, I mostly disagree with the prompt and provide two explanations that decreases its persuasiveness. Although, I concede a few reasons that support the opinion made in the prompt.
First of all, a study approach that a student follows must be directed toward the career he wants to pursue. A nation-wide school curriculum not only inundates the student mind with the knowledge he possibly is never going to use but also, deprives student of achieving major ideas related to the field he wants to choose. For example, a student who wants to be an engineer must be given a curriculum that prioritize math and analysis. Including proportionate amount of study materials about biology or literature is completely absurd. He can be given additional amount of knowledge about the path he wants to choose. This not only helps student to achieve his dream but also prevents him from unwanted distraction.
Moreover, a comprehensive study process that focus on the student desire of achieving knowledge of a particular field ensures his interest in study. For example, a student who want to be a player if given lectures about health, fitness, diet will enthusiastically attend the class with his mind and heart. But the same student when forced to take a math or a literature class does not get more knowledge due to lack of attention. A long time of this forceful study will certainly divest the student willingness in study.
Nevertheless, a uniform approach must always be taken in a country level in the field of education. If a school is given the authority to develop the curriculum based on the student choice there is deviation from a standard approach. Proper judgement of the student once the student comes out of the school in the college level or in selecting person for job can never be immaculate. Also, the curriculum developed may not be scientific which is a very delicate issue. A national curriculum gives the standard for evaluation of a student.
Thus, in conclusion from the above explanation it can be determined that a nimbler curriculum for the student based on his career and interest must be developed but the degree to which this flexibility can serve good must be determined in advance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 394, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ions that decreases its persuasiveness. Although, I concede a few reasons that support t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 101, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ountry level in the field of education. If a school is given the authority to deve...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2088.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 418.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.995215311 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88107814017 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480861244019 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0028260001 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.4 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161461847759 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579003628349 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378808714888 0.0758088955206 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0970763821529 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272257020039 0.0667264976115 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.