A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter the college.
Whether the nation should provide same national curriculum to all students until they enter the college is a controversial topic. On the one hand, one might claim that as the curriculum provided by more different schools can have different qualities, expensive school may have higher quality than cheaper, the students should not be discriminated and the same curriculum should be ensured to all students. However, I agree to the statement for several reasons.
To begin with, the quality of education can deteriorate if the nation provide the same national curriculum. As we all know, each teacher has their own teaching methods and own educating scenarios when teaching the students. Teachers make their own adaptive curriculum by their experiences of teaching and sometimes modify their curriculum more optimally by receiving feedback from their students. However, the curriculum without considering the peculiarity and unique character of each teachers is likely to be superior. Therefore requiring all teachers to follow same curriculum might deprive teachers the opportunity to make desirable curriculum which is fully adaptive to their teaching know-how.
Additionally, we should also consider that all students have different interest and talented fields. As the each students have different interest and dreaming job, areas which each students should focus are all different. Requiring to take same lectures and curriculum without their differed interests, however, is unlikely to lead the student's full potential. For example, a student who wants to be a engineer and another students whose interested area is music should be differentiated. Former student should focus in physics, math, computer science, etc. In contrast, the latter student should concentrate on melody, instruments, code, etc. When the nations are preparing for same curriculum which these students should take, what kind of area do the nations will focus? One might lose their opportunity to take courses which are suitable to their interests.
What is more, students' ability are all different. One may have outstanding intelligence than others and does not need to take basic courses. One also may have slow understanding rate and need to take basic courses. However without considering these difference and considering same curriculum may be harmful to student's performance. If the course is too easy for some students, they are likely to be reluctant taking lectures and paying tuition fee. However if the course is too hard for some students, they are also unlikely to take courses with proper understand. Some might questions 'how about medium level courses?' However medium is not always optimal. Medium level can be harmful to every students as the course can help neither students who have outstanding intelligence and who have relatively inferior intelligence. The country should provide each students an opportunity to take courses which corresponds to their levels.
In conclusion, even though I admit that students should not be discriminated by their wealth, I agree with the statement based on above mentioned reasons. Requiring students to be educated with same curriculum is bane rather than boon. The teachers have rights to create their own optimal curriculum and students also have rights to take courses which corresponds to their levels and interests.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether the nation should provide same national...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 522, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...each teachers is likely to be superior. Therefore requiring all teachers to follow same c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 233, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'taking'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: taking
...ould focus are all different. Requiring to take same lectures and curriculum without th...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 401, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... For example, a student who wants to be a engineer and another students whose int...
^
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ng rate and need to take basic courses. However without considering these difference an...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 450, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...taking lectures and paying tuition fee. However if the course is too hard for some stud...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, kind of, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 12.4196629213 209% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2846.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 518.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49420849421 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77070365392 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8246033954 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.42471042471 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 884.7 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.6854537257 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1379310345 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8620689655 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330711181287 0.243740707755 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104010037709 0.0831039109588 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127692263554 0.0758088955206 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21659999669 0.150359130593 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108829160827 0.0667264976115 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.