A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Some people insist that a nation should provide the same curriculum to all the students until the high school level. However, providing different curriculum depending on students' abilities or needs is more plausible.
Firstly, every student has different abilities in learning, requiring different curriculums. Not every student has the same pace to acquire new concepts, understand their basic principles, and apply them to real life or other cases. For example, in math class, when a new concept is handled in class, some of them might understand it right after the class while others might not. In the next class, if teachers go into the next level such as the applications of the concept, those students who understood the last class can follow it while others cannot. If this kind of situation continues, the students who cannot follow the class properly will end up forgo the subject. If a teacher separates the students into 2 to 3 groups depending on their abilities to understand math class, more students will be happy to take the class. Thus, it shows the needs of different curriculums in accordance with each individual's learning ability.
Secondly, every student has different dreams, and providing different curriculums that are related to each of them is beneficial. Students have different fields of study they want; for example, some students might want to go to medical school to be a doctor while some others might want to go to law school to be a lawyer. However, if a high school provides the same curriculum to both students, they might think some of the parts are irrelevant and make them waste their time. If a school provides different curriculums to those, for example, providing advanced math and science class to the students who want to be a doctor and advanced politics or social science to the students who want to be a lawyer, both of them will be more satisfied exploring the fields of study deeply even before they enter college. Therefore, it shows providing different curriculums according to their needs is beneficial than providing the same curriculum.
On the other hand, some might insist that providing different curriculums is realistically difficult as building a curriculum requires a glut of money and time. However, as it is clear that providing different ones to each group of students is helpful and beneficial, it is worth paying for.
To sum up, although there are many thoughts in providing either the same or different curriculums to students, providing different curriculums depending on students' learning ability and the needs is more plausible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 414, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ulum to both students, they might think some of the parts are irrelevant and make them wast...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... beneficial, it is worth paying for. To sum up, although there are many thoug...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, kind of, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2188.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 427.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12412177986 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76314450557 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.421545667447 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 663.3 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3050677518 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.705882353 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1176470588 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88235294118 5.21951772744 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12671340765 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562018150141 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408373951452 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0931808274471 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413987474999 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.