A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they
enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the
recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and
supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the
recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples
shape your position
How to organize the instruction of students has been a topic discussed since the existence of schools. While it is clear that a common instruction among all the students is necessary in order for someone not to lack on basic and essential concepts, it is also useful to let room for a partial customization of a student's study programme. This improves the availability of a wide range of people with developed personal interests. They can see themselves not as a copy of someone else, but as a unique person.
One of the main reasons that support this assumption is that students, and people in general, are different from each other. Everyone has their own interests, their own abilities, that can make them more capable of doing wonderful things in different areas of life. Making everyone study the same subjects to the same extent is not a good way to proceed, since making a student conform to specific standards could make him or her stressed to the point he or she does not want to continue studying anymore, thus rising the dropoff rate among all schools. When they manage to succeed, however, they might haven't developed their own interests to a sufficient point where they decide they want to specialise in a subject relative to those areas, so a system with the same curricula tends to block the spark of talented people.
Customization, however, cannot be done completely on a study programme. There should be some mandatory subjects with a minimum of hours to attend, so that every student shares the same basic common knowledge on these subjects and doesn't lack necessary concepts or ideas. This is essential to make good citizens with the abilities our modern society requests.
Something very few people think about though, is the long term future. A system like the one presented above is very useful for a nation that wants a good variety of people with developed interests in different areas. This process indeed promotes the spark of creativity on multiple topics, since it is common knowledge that interaction between people with different background can spark creativity.
A system with some mandatory subjects and room for customization could thus be a succesful one for a competitive and good nation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-18 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 66 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
- Some people believe that it is helpful to view a challenging situation as an opportunity for personal growth Others believe that reimagining challenging situations this way occupies too much of the focus one needs to face challenges effectively Write a re 79
- The graphs above give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010 and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar 78
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the mayor of Wistfold A recent study revealed that the number of children requiring medical attention for illnesses in our town is 40 percent higher than in the neighboring town of Champsfield Last year the Cham 53
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion Give reasons for you 44
- The following appeared in an e mail sent by the marketing director of the Classical Shakespeare Theatre of Bardville Over the past ten years there has been a 20 percent decline in the size of the average audience at Classical Shakespeare Theatre productio 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 604, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
... manage to succeed, however, they might havent developed their own interests to a suff...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... common knowledge on these subjects and doesnt lack necessary concepts or ideas. This ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1863.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 374.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98128342246 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70352590213 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51871657754 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.1360655198 60.3974514979 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.2 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9333333333 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162605254356 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504539785285 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363715800595 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920738806883 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218636767032 0.0667264976115 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.