A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible
consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
A nation that prompts all students to study the same curriculum is likely to experience turmoil among the students as a lot of the students would be forced to study certain subjects which are not be of interest to them and are likely to be a burden on them and lower their academic grade. Such a proposition would not be in the best interests of students but it would have some benefits. A national curriculum would benefit the teachers as they would have a fixed outline and syllabus to teach and also it would maintain the same standard of education for all students so that no underprivileged, culturally challenged or some other handicaps would occlude their education. Though, it will have some benefits I mostly disagree with the policy.
It is true that having a national curriculum would maintain a certain common educational standard and educational proficiency among the students. This will help the students from economically challenged backgrounds and other minority students since they are the ones who are the most probable to be left behind. For instance, if each student has to study Physics, Maths, Chemistry and Biology along with a few languages it will give the students an equal ground and help them by setting up a common base so that are able to choose their subjects of liking which would, in turn, help them in choosing a field or career path which they want to pursue like Engineering, Medicine, Philology or Arts. This will help them in selecting an apt career path that concurs with their aptitude and liking. The above example demonstrates a case in which implementing the policy would be beneficial for a particular group of students by giving them an opportunity to be academically sound with their peers and not get left behind in the rat race for jobs and success in today's world.
However, it is most likely that implementing this policy would cause an unfair burden on students as they would have to study subjects which they are disinterested in up to a certain level which will be mentally taxing for them. For instance, a student who has figured out his aptitude and is good at Math and Physics and wants to pursue engineering would have to study Biology, Languages, History, Geography etc. which are of no interest to him. He would have to burn his midnight oil studying these subjects to have a decent academic grade and may not find the time to pursue his/her passion and be able to increase his penchant for engineering further. This might deter him from giving his best in Engineering and he might end up being average or a mediocre engineer in today's world which would cause him to lose good jobs. This example illustrates how implementing the policy would be unfavourable for students who have discovered their interest and have a strong penchant for certain subjects.
Another reason that implementing this policy might backfire is the teacher's interest in teaching might wane. For instance, students who have a certain animosity towards a particular subject when are instructed to study and take classes of that subject are more likely to take out their frustration and anger in a class by being disrespectful towards the teacher or being a nuisance and a disturbance to students as well. This will not only impact the learning of the students who are interested in taking that class and studying the subject sincerely but also vex the teacher and hinder her teaching. The denouement will be that the teacher will be disinterested in teaching and would resort to teaching the bare minimum and without alacrity causing an overall decline in the educational standard. This example highlights one of the drawbacks of implementing this policy and is likely to cause more harm than good.
Thus there might be a few advantages in implementing the policy but in the bigger picture, it would not benefit the students or teachers and students would decrease student's inclination towards education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...to study certain subjects which are not be of interest to them and are likely to b...
^^
Line 1, column 675, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...andicaps would occlude their education. Though, it will have some benefits I mostly di...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...likely to cause more harm than good. Thus there might be a few advantages in impl...
^^^^
Line 9, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...students inclination towards education.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, thus, well, as to, for instance, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 33.0 12.4196629213 266% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 36.0 14.8657303371 242% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 24.0 11.3162921348 212% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 59.0 33.0505617978 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3282.0 2235.4752809 147% => OK
No of words: 666.0 442.535393258 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92792792793 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.08005667302 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72510568157 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.403903903904 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1022.4 704.065955056 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.1105190533 60.3974514979 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.285714286 118.986275619 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.7142857143 23.4991977007 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.61904761905 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135688606347 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527846890767 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374303435498 0.0758088955206 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0922847317156 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228341319013 0.0667264976115 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.8971910112 155% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.