A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The author recommends to have a same national curriculum for all students until they enter college. As appeasing as this might seem there are several drawbacks to having a common ground to judge various students with different capabilities and mindsets.
Forcing students to follow a common curriculum till they enter college may not prove to be advantageous for them. Different students have varying level of creative and analytical abilities. For eg, a student who may excel in art or sports may not be able to solve simple math problems. This may demotivate the student and pressurize his/her parents as well. Additionally, another student of the same class may be very intelligent in math and science, however severely lacks in sports. This student may lose the opportunity of scoring high due to less grades in Physical Education. Thus, adopting this recommendation would not work for a significant amount of students and in fact stunt their progress, who otherwise might excel in their domains.
Moreover, students may not all be from the same financial or economic background. This plays a major role while reasoning with this recommendation as it is possible that parents of students who have a stable financial living may want a better curriculum for their child. They may be willing to spend more to ensure the best result for their offsprings. On the other hand, parents of students from a poor background may not have enough resources to spend on the educatation of their child. Here, students should have reservations and choices to study only specically something could help them to become financially independent and grow further. Such families should not be forced with the same curriculum which they can't afford. This would infact be a hinderance for the literacy of that country.
Howsoever, some may argue that a same common base may allows students of different levels to be judged on the same platform and thus makes the evaluation of deserved candidates easier. For eg, in India the students of engineering background are compulsorily asked to give JEE Mains to apply for the course. The results of this exam provide the base for which students are eligible and which aren't. This may give an easy way for the college and institutions to decide who to admit it may still not provide give an accurate position in determining a students abilities.
Thereby, while the recommendation seems to be beneficial for the nation, there are other factors that need to be taken into consideration before making any final decisions for the future of the country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommends having'.
Suggestion: recommends having
The author recommends to have a same national curriculum for all stud...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 547, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun grades is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... the opportunity of scoring high due to less grades in Physical Education. Thus, ado...
^^^^
Line 5, column 423, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... students from a poor background may not have enough resources to spend on the ed...
^^
Line 5, column 717, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ced with the same curriculum which they cant afford. This would infact be a hinderan...
^^^^
Line 7, column 393, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...r which students are eligible and which arent. This may give an easy way for the coll...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, still, thus, well, while, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2158.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 425.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07764705882 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79424618899 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503529411765 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 673.2 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7305904208 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.761904762 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2380952381 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227210125013 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850054901051 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770224219037 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148814692738 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508768544034 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.