Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Basing the salaries of the teachers' on the success of their students doesn't seem an apt claim. While it is true that a good teacher is the one whose students excel, it mustn't be the deciding factor of his/her salary.
It is entirely wrong to base a teachers salary solely on the basis of the academic performance of his/her student. As this claim assumes that a teacher's credibility is merely based on the fact that most of the students score maximum. This is howsoever is not true. Let us consider this scenario where Teacher A has various types of students in her class. Some are sharp while others a little weak. Teacher B however has a class full of bright students. Teacher A takes a lot of effort and improves the scores of weak students and they score higher than their previous average. Teacher B takes very little effort and his/her students being bright study on their own and achieve great scores. This scenario shows that Teacher A actually being a better teacher would not be paid as much as Teacher B only due the policy stating that the teacher teaching the students with better grades gets paid better.
A teacher is often judged on the basis of how her students perform. This thought process is not wrong. A child is encouraged and guided by their teachers. A young child tends to treat his teacher as his/her idol and follows everything the teacher says. The teacher, here, has the responsibility of shaping the child's mind, inspiring curiosity and helping achieve academic success. For example, when I was in kindergarten, my teacher Ms. Verma was my greatest idol. At some point I listened to her more than to my parents. She helped me focus of my education and enjoy what I studied.
While it is a fact that a teacher has a significant importance in a child's life, it cannot be said that he/she are the only factors which lead them to excel. Teachers might give their best to help a student improve but it does finally depend on the child if he/she wishes to focus on their academics. Sometimes the attitudes of the parents of the children may not be supportive to what the faculty says. For eg, In the state of Gujrat most parents of wealthy families do not think highly of education. They wish for their children to continue with their business thus encouraging them to work and not study. Thus in situations as such despite the teacher's efforts the students may not reciprocate the efforts taken.
A teacher shall not be awarded by paying higher salary for better academic results from students, but, school boards may decide to award them to boost their morale and give them a push to do better.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 70, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...achers on the success of their students doesnt seem an apt claim. While it is true tha...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: mustn't
...her is the one whose students excel, it mustnt be the deciding factor of his/her salar...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...lary. It is entirely wrong to base a teachers salary solely on the basis of the acade...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...cademic performance of his/her student. As this claim assumes that a teachers cred...
^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...r student. As this claim assumes that a teachers credibility is merely based on the fact...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'A take' or simply 'takes'?
Suggestion: A take; Takes
... class full of bright students. Teacher A takes a lot of effort and improves the scores...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 578, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ore higher than their previous average. Teacher B takes very little effort and his/her ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 112, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...lds life, it cannot be said that he/she are the only factors which lead them to exc...
^^^
Line 7, column 609, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...encouraging them to work and not study. Thus in situations as such despite the teach...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, however, if, may, so, thus, while, for example, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 33.0505617978 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2170.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 465.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66666666667 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4206266669 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501075268817 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.3360786473 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4615384615 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8846153846 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.15384615385 5.21951772744 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246299131903 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691406716794 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528774679142 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145042739482 0.150359130593 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486117311852 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 14.1392134831 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 48.8420337079 146% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.1743820225 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 12.1639044944 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.