A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you t

Essay topics:

A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

School education is of immense importance. It is the aspect of one's life that shapes what kind of an individual one might become as a citizen of the country. According to the prompt, a nation should have a standardized national syllabus for all schooling up until college where they may choose the subjects that may interest them. In my opinion, I moderately disagree with the statement for three reasons.
To begin with, a standard nationalized syllabus will enable all the citizens of the nation to be on equal terms when it comes to opportunities and exposure. For instance, consider a country with a relatively uniform society where the difference of culture is not much, language is uniform, and so on. Both, the rich and poor students of this country would get an equal opportunity to succeed in life. Their higher studies and professional career would not be hindered or boosted because of the schooling which they may have received in their early years. They will stand on equal footing and will be able to make their way in this competitive world on their own merit.
However, this argument would fall flat when considering a country as vast as India where there are a billion people who speak hundreds of languages, follow different religions and essentially live completely different lives from one another. A nationalized syllabus in this case would force people from many segments to undergo a major cultural and behavioural change which may be fine for some, but unacceptable for others. Here, a syllabus devised by a local authority with guidance and input from a national governing body would ensure that all students get a wholesome, well rounded education and equal footing with both their national and international peers.
Lastly, a varied syllabus in the early life of a student would help her find where her interest lies. A certain fixed syllabus with a variety of elective and audit subjects would surely ensure a more well-rounded indiviadual who knows herself and the world around her. The choosing of subjects would also enable her to become a better decision maker and risk taker and would also enable her to choose her own career earlier on in life. This would be beneficial for both, her and the nation as the country will have responsible citizens who can think for themselves and are not just running a rat race for grades.
In conclusion, this is a highly contested topic with many perspectives and no simple answer. Nations have produced world class engineers, thinkers, and excellence in all walks of life with different approaches to education. In this matter, there may be no certain answer as being human is being unique and this uniqueness is what differentiates us from mute animals.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 64, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...immense importance. It is the aspect of ones life that shapes what kind of an indivi...
^^^^
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: KIND_OF_A[1]
Message: Don't include 'an' after a classification term. Use simply 'kind of'.
Suggestion: kind of
...he aspect of ones life that shapes what kind of an individual one might become as a citize...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, lastly, may, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2270.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 458.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95633187773 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70544018067 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517467248908 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 721.8 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6082157435 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.473684211 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1052631579 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94736842105 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159501015234 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551998551986 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05448689691 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0993627249732 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437135057083 0.0667264976115 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.