A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
It is a well-known fact that not all children are alike when it comes to mental growth. Some kids' brains develop earlier than others. Moreover, areas of brains develop differently in children, as some grow up to be more adept scientifically, whereas others might become skilled artists. Therefore, a certain level of specialization during high-school could help with the improvement of the unique abilities of students before college.
Early specialization has proven to be more detrimental than beneficial for the younger generation. In a study carried out recently, it was observed that periods of high productivity are more likely to occur after periods of trying different things and exploring less familiar fields and subjects. As a result of this line of research, many educators are worried that early specialization in the school system, might be disadvantageous for the children. For instance, following early advanced scientific classes in a certain field, practicing one sport or playing one musical instrument could rob the child of the oportunity to explore different fields and gain the benefits assocaited with doing so.
Considering this, a limited degree of specialization which guarantees students having enough time to explore various areas, could provide them with the benefits of specialization without having the disadvantages of early specialization. The human brain gets stronger by practice. The more the neurons are stimulated, the stronger the bonds between them will get. Furthermore, children's brain is more plastic than that of the adults, and this plasticity decreases as the time goes by. Therefore, practicing a certain skill or ability during childhood could have substantial impact on how adept the child will grow up to be in that field. Thus, assigning a balanced combination of specialized and general classes to children based on their abilities could be beneficial for them.
In order to create a balanced curriculum containing general classes as well as specialized ones, the inborn skills of children must be identified. The major part of every kids curriculum should consist of general classes similar for all students. This general training will guarantee the child gets enough time to explore different areas and discover his/her interests. On the other hand, the limited specialized training will build on any talent that the child has in order to give him/her a boost if he/she decides to continue that path in the future.
To conclude, the benefits of practicing a skill in a child who shows innate abilities in that area, are irrefutable. However, the destructive effects of early and over specialization should be taken into account as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'brain'.
Suggestion: brain
...en it comes to mental growth. Some kids brains develop earlier than others. Moreover, ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 172, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'kids'' or 'kid's'?
Suggestion: kids'; kid's
... be identified. The major part of every kids curriculum should consist of general cl...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, for instance, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2280.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 424.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37735849057 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00200182411 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528301886792 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 701.1 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.006037392 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 5.21951772744 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0441907590108 0.243740707755 18% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0156463585233 0.0831039109588 19% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0278258672114 0.0758088955206 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0284399331616 0.150359130593 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0169955887013 0.0667264976115 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.