A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Educational contents taught in the schools have been a real bone of contention and there are a lot of arguments for and against the homogeneity of lessons and studies in the school. While proponents of uniformity proclaim that the a similar curriculum of incumbent topics must be used in the schools all over a country, the opponents claim that these uniform structure might have dire consequences on the process of learning among the students. In this essay, this notion will be discussed from different angles.
One the one hand, education in highschools is of paramount importance as it can prepare them for their future work or profession. In this perspective, the fact that schools have got to use a pre-determined but simultaneously homogenous syllabus seems untenable bearing in mind that schools must just try to prepare the students for vieng in the fierce job market. For instance, consider a school where all students must pass lessons like history, geography, literature and so forth . In those situation, the school neglect the fact that all the students must be prepared for the job market and those soft subjects will be unnecssary for them.
Furthermore, surprisingly, is that teaching the single-canned curriculum to all types of students with different degrees of aptitude and preferences may be tantamount to neglecting those interests and aptitudes resulting in weakening those students in terms of their abilities. Bear in mind an example that a student who has a genius for painting, but he is obliged to pass all those soft objects like history and literature. But it is pellucid that if he dedicated more of his time to just painting, he would be more successful on that in the future in terms of findng a lucrative job.
The other side of the coin, surprisingly, is that having a uniform list of lessons studied in schools have some privileges. Firstly, it can render the process of assessing students far easier compared to the case that each student be appraised just according to the topic related to his talent. Secondly, the homogenity of lessons in schools all over a country can make individuals more well-knowledged and protean which will be useful for them in their future lives.
By the light of above notions, it is advisable to say that while the uniformity of lessons in highschools can thwart abilities of many students since be forced to follow a pre-determined structure, it can be beneficial for the process of assessment and also be good for them in the future as they be brought up more versatile.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
... proponents of uniformity proclaim that the a similar curriculum of incumbent topics ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l be discussed from different angles. One the one hand, education in highschoo...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 488, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...tory, geography, literature and so forth . In those situation, the school neglect ...
^^
Line 3, column 494, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this situation' or 'those situations'?
Suggestion: this situation; those situations
...geography, literature and so forth . In those situation, the school neglect the fact that all t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...subjects will be unnecssary for them. Furthermore, surprisingly, is that teach...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in terms of findng a lucrative job. The other side of the coin, surprisingly...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...seful for them in their future lives. By the light of above notions, it is adv...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2126.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 426.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99061032864 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93754308509 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 659.7 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.9993997573 60.3974514979 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.857142857 118.986275619 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4285714286 23.4991977007 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.21951772744 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.092273802771 0.243740707755 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0378923440271 0.0831039109588 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.026914558563 0.0758088955206 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0579377990647 0.150359130593 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0167442019097 0.0667264976115 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.