A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Nation must have a same national curriculum for some of the fields, but must not confine their schools to follow the same. This might not only affect the trainers or teachers but would also hamper nation's ability to give rise to students which are more competent then others in their specified fields.
Same national curriculum would allow schools to restrict their extra subjects which they usually undertake for students who wish to attend some extra lectures apart from their scheduled one's. Allowing students to attend such extra lectures might help them choose their field of interest accordingly once they enter their high schools or colleges. Hence, apart from same national curriculum, students must be allowed to pursue their interests in diversity of fields which schools might offer.
Teacher are restricted to the same national curriculum every year and it would be really difficult for them to move out of their spheres. Having same curriculum every year might be disadvantageous for teachers who seek to explain topics which are apart from the curriculum for some interested students. Also, from a broader point of view, it might be really very difficult for teacher who wishes to join some other institution due to restricted curriculum that he might be teaching all these years. Hence, from future point of view, for teachers, it would prove to be unnecessary to follow the same curriculum every year.
Although implementation of such a curriculum might help students to now compete on a national level instead of state one. Competition to get into good colleges might thrive, allowing students to recognize their hidden potentials. This would not only enhance student's knowledge but also would allow a country's economy to grow by engendering deserving students. But advantages related to such national curriculum is far more limited as compared to its disadvantages. Even such benefits would be applicable only under certain conditions.
Allowing a national curriculum, would in a way increase competition on a national level, but on the other hand, would even hamper or restrict students careers. Not only students, but even teachers would be confined to follow their perfunctory scheduled of teaching the same subjects with same curriculum every year. Therefore, national curriculum must just be restricted for some subjects while giving independence to schools to have their extra subjects aligned with the interests of their students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ust have a same national curriculum for some of the fields, but must not confine their scho...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...se to students which are more competent then others in their specified fields. ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ow the same curriculum every year. Although implementation of such a curriculum mig...
^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 502, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d with the interests of their students.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, hence, if, really, so, then, therefore, while, apart from, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2087.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 389.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36503856041 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69828359017 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.449871465296 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 637.2 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2256623211 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 122.764705882 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8823529412 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88235294118 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245990672643 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108578219925 0.0831039109588 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691945047984 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172039084447 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521966124256 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.