Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through large quantities of information and find what’s important.
Mass media and Internet have made life's easier for people by making information available in huge quantities as and when required. Although, it has a number of advantages but the negative side cannot be overlooked. People are more focused towards the influential things whether or not, it might be wrong or correct, but still is described and made available on internet and mass media.
A number of news channels, now, have their own websites, digging through which, information is made available in more detail. Internet has created a metropolitan society where each and every news from any corner of the continent is made available within minutes. Short summary of the news is enough for people to differentiate information which they ought to read and which ones to neglect. Hence, considering above factors, people's time has been reduced by a huge extant by making each and every thing available as required.
Although the point stated above has a number of advantages, we cannot overlook the fact that as more and more information is available, redundant news or information regarding any fallacies is also spreading at an alarming rate. People are being baffled with wrong information and just as people tend to read it within short spans, sometimes overlook the main point and trust the information without reading any further. This then creates a bad notion among the population and people then tend to behave accordingly. Hence, focusing on just the information that is valid, sometimes has a negative effect on people.
If we consider an example of online mails which contain information such as lottery and prize money pool which have been won by the people who receive such mail. In some cases, as people are already aware of such fraudulent mails tend to ignore such mails. While, majority of people tend to overlook any information related to online scams or technology based as such news do not tend to their areas of interest, are the main culprit of such mails. This results in huge money loss or cyber attack. Hence, although media and internet provide huge information, some people just tend to overlook some of those as they are completely divergent than the things which they are interested in.
Hence, even if media and internet has allowed people to dig through a huge quantity of information and has made it more easier and time effective for people, it has exacerbated the previous frauds. As people tend to read only the things which are important, they tend to sometimes miss the more important things which might prove to be beneficent for them. Summaries from mass media and internet might not be able to replace the traditional newspaper which contains information of day to day activities in much more detail.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 271, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... focused towards the influential things whether or not, it might be wrong or correct, but stil...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 116, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...quantity of information and has made it more easier and time effective for people, it has e...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, hence, if, look, regarding, so, still, then, while, in short, such as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2303.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 458.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02838427948 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62118335882 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.451965065502 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 731.7 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1995268771 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.210526316 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1052631579 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248751356882 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864176122886 0.0831039109588 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567560485227 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157371093679 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441582938716 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.