A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Education plays a vital role in the social and economic development of any country which includes diverse fields. A country needs to be developed in all the sector and that's why people of different background plays a significant role in the progress of the country. Hence, a nation should require students of different filed and they should be taught accordingly with the different syllabus.
We are in the twenty-first century. The century with the advancement in all the areas that requires great knowledge and in skills from the base levels. Let's take an example of a developed country like Japan, USA, China and soon on, they provide an option to their student from the ground level to choose the subject what they want so that they would be able to do what they wish in their life. They progress a lot in every field. Some are good in mathematics, some in economics, some in sciences, medicals and soon. They became able to get excellence on the field they chose. So, there is the necessity of a separate curriculum in different fields.
Developing countries like Nepal, Syria, Bhutan, etc, they have a similar curriculum to all the students. As a result of which they are bounded to invest their time in the same courses whether they are interested or not. Some may be interested in science and technology, or economics, or cultures and traditions, or journalism and soon. If they are provided with same level of curriculum and the same materials, they may have little knowledge of wide subjects but they might get behind on the field they chose. And again it would create confusion on the dream they chose to.
Great scientist Albert Einstein, Facebook owner Mark Zuckerberg's, Microsoft Owner Bill Gates and so on are some of the renown personalities who choose their own way to pursue their dream. Einstein was interested in the Physis who spent his whole life in the scientific theory of physics and finally came along with different theories like the Theory of relativity and energy conservation. Zuckerberg and Bill Gates are college dropouts still they progress in their field because they were interested in one field that their school curriculum does not provide.
A country with citizens from a different background is hence necessary to build the country and for that curriculum should be developed differently for the students of different backgrounds so that they could become an opulent, dynamic and progressive citizen in the particular field in near future.
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterward are poor decision-makers. 50
- "Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerne 49
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 35
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
...s to be developed in all the sector and thats why people of different background play...
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: LETS_LET
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
...dge and in skills from the base levels. Lets take an example of a developed country ...
Line 13, column 108, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE
Message: Simply use 'some'.
...icrosoft Owner Bill Gates and so on are some of the renown personalities who choose their o...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, finally, first, hence, if, may, so, still, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2083.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 416.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00721153846 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68182087963 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502403846154 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.8914319881 60.3974514979 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.631578947 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8947368421 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78947368421 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215151480897 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681505335689 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677025802172 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120914360764 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538957813439 0.0667264976115 81% => OK
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.