A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college
The choice of a students study curriculum is not a trivial one. In fact, a lot of the decisions the students make before entering into college have long lasting effects in their academic and their professional lives. The prompt recommends that a nation should require all of its students to study a homogeneous curriculum until they enter college. In my opinion, I mostly agree with this particular suggestion and argue that a nation should be rigid while providing a curriculum for school and high school going students.
Recently, New York Times published and article saying that students before college are facing difficulties and they are convoluted in making choices for specific courses. The thesis comes from 3 separate viewpoints, the personal interest, coping up with higher studies and the volatile job market. Many scholars don't often find what they are deft at till a certain age. For that reason, the curriculum should be similar for every student before college so that they can get the same base to burgeon and find out intrinsic capabilities to match with their higher studies. Students think that they have a proclivity towards something until their perspectives change with time.
On the other hand, courses or subjects after or during college might be hard to comprehend for students who take a different path than they were at till their college. This leads to a confounded personality and not being able to adapt with other students. For instance, a student who has read all of basic science, business and history studies till college might not have the grasp of advanced, let alone intermediate physics. So, a structured path with courses or subjects a student wants to pursue regarding their career, should be better for them. Whereas, studying a little bit of everything might not elucidate them in choosing a major in under graduation which will eventually lead to a career path.
Thirdly, the volatile nature of the ever shifting job market is also a reason why students should have a grasp of every major courses till college so that they can benefit from the career trends beforehand and preclude any major issues. For example, from 2000 to 2010 there was a huge demand of computer engineers and information technology experts as there was a rise and shift in the progress of technology itself. Nowadays, where machine learning and artificial intelligence is on the rise, digitization in the work place has rendered computer engineers and information technology experts obsolete. Therefore, the subjects related to computer or information technology are less coveted.
I agree that the nation should require all the students to study the same curriculum. However, I do think that the government and the educational institutes should also consider that students sometimes can not adapt with the shift when their studies transcends to a newer level from such a trivial one. Paradoxically, the only way to prevent this from happening is giving them a taste of everything to see what they have a knack towards and students who disagree with this and might want to pursue a specific line of study might be doing so at their own peril.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 313, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... the volatile job market. Many scholars dont often find what they are deft at till a...
^^^^
Line 9, column 552, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...heir career, should be better for them. Whereas, studying a little bit of everything mi...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 572, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...be better for them. Whereas, studying a little bit of everything might not elucidate them ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, third, thirdly, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in fact, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2655.0 2235.4752809 119% => OK
No of words: 523.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07648183556 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78217453174 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68182414028 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.499043977055 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 822.6 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0988467704 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.428571429 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9047619048 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90476190476 5.21951772744 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366400446925 0.243740707755 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127147416772 0.0831039109588 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.173496715874 0.0758088955206 229% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220045864812 0.150359130593 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14389827331 0.0667264976115 216% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.