You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Some people feel that entertainers such as film stars, pop musicians or sports stars are paid too much money.
Do you agree or disagree?
Which other types of job should be highly paid?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
The prompt tells that there is a perception among a number of people that film stars, pop musicians or sport stars are paid too much money. I somewhat disagree with this point of view. Reasons behind my point of view are written below.
Firstly, according to the New York Times, a very renowned tabloid, states that not all film stars are highly paid. Entertainers like sports stars and pop musicians also share this statistics as per their article. So, I would disagree that all these entertainers receive the same level of income.
Secondly, entertainers are not paid based on their talents rather than their image in the world and the views of the audience. Great films, sports prodigies, and good music might be underrated because there is not enough marketing done. So, the entertainers behind it don't get the recognition or the monetary value that they deserve. For example, Joaquin Phoenix, a renowned Hollywood film-star and Oscar winner in 2020 was among the lowest paid actors in Hollywood till 2010. Current sports legends like Gareth Bale, a well established football player had a low income 2007. Also, bands like Beach House, The Marias, Sufjan Stevens despite their great talent and unique music are still not that recognized among the majority of music listeners.
Finally, I would like to say that no job should be considered as High pay or Low pay based on the criteria itself, the income should be based on their level of merit and talent, and what they provide to the society rather than the category of job.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...orts stars and pop musicians also share this statistics as per their article. So, I ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ng done. So, the entertainers behind it dont get the recognition or the monetary val...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, still, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89272030651 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38439188115 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60153256705 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4648216568 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2307692308 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0769230769 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260977385696 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848031160914 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757523739286 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162893320629 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584176827563 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.