Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
Leadership is a quality that is quite often very obscure to the populace. The word and the quality is ostensibly "understood" by the masses whereas very few can actually comprehend the real meaning behind it.
A leader is not someone who just motivates people, or guides people through the right way. Taking the right decision at the right time is also the leaders duty. While doing this, his/her followers might be dissatisfied with their decision but that should not obstruct the leader in taking the decision.
In reality, when a football coach takes of the star player from the pitch at the 80th minute, the team or the audience or the player himself might not agree with his decision. Some even act on the intense anger that they feel at that moment. But the coach keeps his calm and has his own reasons, like avoiding an injury risk or fatigue.
This is actually a good example of why the leader should never let others debase his/her decision simply by emotion or by being lax.
However, followers do look for the end result. Unanimous decisions are always appreciated by followers. But, when an unapproved decision doesn't work out as planned, credibility of the leader starts decreasing.
Being a leader is not always about being right or being the fan-favorite. It's about thinking about the best possible solution in any given situation disregarding the emotions of your peers.
Thus, I think that as a leader it's not always important to maintain the respect of his/her peers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
... decision at the right time is also the leaders duty. While doing this, his/her followe...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 138, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...owers. But, when an unapproved decision doesnt work out as planned, credibility of the...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 32, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...peers. Thus, I think that as a leader its not always important to maintain the re...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, look, regarding, so, thus, whereas, while, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 58.6224719101 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1254.0 2235.4752809 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 254.0 442.535393258 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93700787402 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67935297374 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602362204724 0.4932671777 122% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 704.065955056 53% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6981169749 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.6 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9333333333 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245541705854 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754008580335 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0937914638272 0.0758088955206 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124493410071 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109667674498 0.0667264976115 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 14.1392134831 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 100.480337079 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.