A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Academics is a crucial phase in every student’s life. It forms a strong base for the students to build up their knowledge and skills. The author recommends having a same national curriculum before entering college. In order to decide how successful it can be, various factors need to be looked upon.
The idea does seem to be impactful as it will generate a uniformity for evaluation during their college admissions. As these students will have to face the same hurdles, the competition will be fair. Currently, in Indian academic circle, there are different educational boards available for students like the state boards, union boards, etc. Thus for admission process in college, individual criteria is set according to the board the student belongs. Measures are taken to ensure uniformity for the process but such assurance is hard to be presented. Students from each board do feel that there are some indifferences occurring during the process. Such problems can be eliminated by creating a uniform platform.
Along with it, it will be easier for the government to monitor a large number of students from all over the country. Even beneficial schemes for promoting a culture among the students will be possible to implement. But care has to be taken during such a move that the student’s interests are not affected as well. The curriculum should be set in such a way that every student may have the opportunity to pursue his or her field of interest. This can help the students know about their skills and work in the same direction even before entering the college.
This idea can be successful enough by proper implementation and keeping the student’s interests in mind. A common platform will definitely serve to create a sense of fair competition among the students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 64, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...be easier for the government to monitor a large number of students from all over the country. Eve...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, so, thus, well, as to, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 296.0 442.535393258 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08783783784 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8554792715 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567567567568 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.7337620534 60.3974514979 34% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.6666666667 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4444444444 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181152867322 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628870704571 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079368672605 0.0758088955206 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116672906238 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0714438009649 0.0667264976115 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.