A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Though the ultimate goal to provide mental nourishment for the youth is consensus, educational system varies greatly around the globe. Therefore, on-size-fit-all ideology might not work for all nations. The statement has brought up two key hypotheses: (1) A conformed national curriculum should be enforced to all institutes across the country; (2) The designated structure should be remained the same until the students enter college. From an array of evident, I support the approach of having a consistent curriculum for fundamental knowledge constructed on both social and science repertoires. Also, it should be implemented up until the point when more clarity on career interest is drawn from the students, in most cases, pre-college deems substantial.
There is an array of benefits brought by having a consistent teaching content and approaches. From the perspective of education suppliers, schools and teachers would find it much easier to deliver lessons and facilitate grading system. If there exist multiple curriculums, it potently imposed challenges whenever lecturers transfer from one institute to the other. The same goes for students, due to the diversity in teaching material, exchanging or transferring would not make possible. As a beneficiary of such system, I could be confident to delegate the advantages of a uniform scheme, which has been practices in Vietnam until 2010. The curriculum included 13 core syllabus comprising both science subjects (Math, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, etc.) and social subjects (Literature, Geography, History, Moral study, etc.). Despite the pressure to survive all of those, it did lay a strong foundation for most students preparing their step to college. Whereby most recent graduates from the alternative elective methodology suffer as they don’t possess enough knowledge pool and cognitive asset to enroll in major of their interest.
As mentioned above, this system could raise concerns on overloading students with information unnecessarily. Thus, adopting an all-in-on curriculum might not be ideal considering the level of education could be vastly differed between cities and rural provinces. Where educational funding is limited, either are teaching staffs being distracted by higher-paid job or students are unable to afford education being the breadwinners to their family. Thus, keeping up with 13 subjects would be least of their concerns. This scenario could be most evidently relevant to developing countries where governmental and social resources are scarce and unevenly distributed. In this case, the real issue would not be which system to take but rather addressing the question of how to alleviate education stability, so more youth could get involved in scholarly activities.
Another highlight of having a singular model until students are ready for college is that it deprives the stress of having to make a grave decision in life way before they are ready. Especially in an Asian context, where most young adults are relatively reliant on their parents to draft their paths, accustoming them into a universal education system would potentially decrease rate of impulsive or precarious judgement on their career plan. On the other hand, one might argue that major countries like the U.S, Australia and Europe have seized many successes with the elective integration beginning from their junior high. The paradigm underpinning this scheme is the result of various political and social factors ranging from highly state-oriented education structure, strong government funding, belief in liberty and motivation for specialization. As the ultimate goal is to inspire students to excel in area of their interests instead of persuading them to secure a job in a seemingly prospective industry as most institutions in developing countries do.
In conclusion, I think a single uniform curriculum is effective to ensure the process of transmitting and adopting knowledge are consistent while removing friction wherever transferal or exchanging occurs. On a higher level, students would have sufficient time to integrate and interact with various subjects until they figure out the most suitable package.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 671, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'syllabus' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'syllabi', 'syllabuses'.
Suggestion: syllabi; syllabuses
...l 2010. The curriculum included 13 core syllabus comprising both science subjects Math, ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 821, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...re, Geography, History, Moral study, etc.. Despite the pressure to survive all of ...
^^
Line 7, column 511, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...t argue that major countries like the U.S, Australia and Europe have seized many ...
^
Line 7, column 1062, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nstitutions in developing countries do. In conclusion, I think a single uniform ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, thus, while, i think, in conclusion, in most cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 93.0 58.6224719101 159% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3553.0 2235.4752809 159% => OK
No of words: 635.0 442.535393258 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59527559055 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.01988110783 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9818098166 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 358.0 215.323595506 166% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563779527559 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 1102.5 704.065955056 157% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.131971437 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.592592593 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5185185185 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142471651405 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0382558993574 0.0831039109588 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423230438283 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0857666698919 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453974834205 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 14.1392134831 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.1639044944 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.38706741573 121% => OK
difficult_words: 216.0 100.480337079 215% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.