Education systems varied from country to country. While a common national curriculum is beneficial at some basic level of education, it is banal to require all the students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Many argue that a common curriculum helps students to have a standard level of education at the end of each education level. Furthermore, it ensures a stable and universal learning pattern in different parts of the country, which reduces the student confusion if he needs to transfer from school to another, since families may allocate for different reasons.This argument is not totally true, the national curriculum should be just a baseline at the early stages of education. Students at elementary and secondary stages should have basic knowledge in different subjects. For instance, every student has to comprehend the basics of mathematics and review the history of his country.
In the other hand, the common curriculum should not neglect the uniqueness of each student. Every student has different ways of thinking, interests, strengths, and weaknesses, which should be taken into consideration in his learning process. For example, an outstanding student will find the average common curriculum mundane, It will provoke his intellectual thinking and impede his creativity. As a result, he will lose his interest in learning. In contrary, a slow student will find the same curriculum arduous. Which will frustrate him, eventually, he will also lose his interest in learning. That is to say, a common fixed curriculum will hinder students curiosity to learn and provoke their creative thinking. It is recommended to motivate teachers to develop their own teaching styles and methodologies. For instance, Finland education system, ranked number one in the national education ranking, is leading the world by its creativity. Teachers are encouraged to develop their teaching styles to suit their student's needs and abilities, and they will do whatever it takes them to create a success story out of each student.
Moreover, it is more efficient for students at high school level to spend their time taking further classes in subjects they are interested in and suit their future goals than wasting it trying to comprehend subjects which are irrelevant to them. For example, an exceptional student in mathematics, who is planning to pursue his education in the engineering field, will find it a waste of time to study biology and history, while he can widen his knowledge in relevant subjects and boosts his creativity in that path.
In conclusion, while it is essential for all the students to have basic knowledge in different subjects, creativity and curiosity cannot be promoted with a rigid education system.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 359, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...lies may allocate for different reasons.This argument is not totally true, the natio...
^^^^
Line 5, column 652, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
..., a common fixed curriculum will hinder students curiosity to learn and provoke their cr...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1133, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...te a success story out of each student. Moreover, it is more efficient for stude...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2328.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 438.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31506849315 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86293358856 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479452054795 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 725.4 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.7715970678 60.3974514979 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.526315789 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0526315789 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.21951772744 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219134088001 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732393587376 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676992669077 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142181875891 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0753856661743 0.0667264976115 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.