A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Education bolsters the foundation of the society. Hence, it is crucial that each and every students garner the required knowledge to better themselves and the society. During this quest for knowledge, I agree to a large extent with the recommendation, stating that a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. This provides them a well-rounded development and exposure, but it should not be strictly enforced as it will impede the learning journey.
First and foremost, studying the same national curriculum ensures that students obtain a well-rounded development. This is especially important since students may not know exactly where their interests lie. Hence, its best to provide them with a wide range of exposures so as to allow them to identify what they are interested in and would like to pursue as a career. For example, a student who chose not to study math in high school because it is boring may decided to become an engineer when he enters college. However, because of the lack in math foundation, he may struggle to achieve his goal. Hence, providing a well-round foundation ensures that students can have sufficient expertise to strive to achieve their goal when they enter college.
Next, studying the same national curriculum when young helps to develop different forms of characteristics in the student. For example, taking math and physics classes helps to develop important skillsets such as analytical and problem-solving skills. Taking art and literature classes helps to develop other skillsets such as creativity and critical thinking. All of these skillsets are crucial in both school and workplace, no matter the fields. Hence, providing students with the same national curriculum ensures that they can have a well-rounded development in terms of knowledge and skillsets.
However, in some cases, some students may already have decided on what they would like to pursue as a career. This enforcement of taking the same national curriculum as the rest may hence impede their learning. For example, a secondary school student may have decided to become an engineer and would like pursue this interest wholeheartedly. However, enforcing him to study other curriculum, such as literature or art, may instead take away his time to participate in other more fruitful activities, such part-time internship to gain relevant experiences. Hence, in this case, it may not be advisable to strictly enforce students as such to study the same national curriculum as others.
In conclusion, strict enforcement in education will only impede the learning of students. The same national curriculum should be provided to all students because it builds a strong foundation to which students can expand upon it once they enter college. However, secondary schools and junior colleges should also have the options of slightly different courses in their education. For example, some junior colleges could have science and art streams, to cater to students of different interests. Within each stream, there will be courses from the other as well to ensure a well-rounded development. Thus, I believe a nation should require all of its students to study similar national curriculum but also have the choice in specialising at the end of high school.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ide them with a wide range of exposures so as to allow them to identify what they are in...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, second, so, thus, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2799.0 2235.4752809 125% => OK
No of words: 529.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29111531191 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79583152331 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86397212394 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.427221172023 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 869.4 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7789895703 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.653846154 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3461538462 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76923076923 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.45019340352 0.243740707755 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131683277994 0.0831039109588 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162307065562 0.0758088955206 214% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292354219888 0.150359130593 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107356095924 0.0667264976115 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.