The recommendation suggests that all the students in a school must be taught the same national curriculum until they enter college. Typically, the schools are affiliated to some or the other board and the curriculum taught in the school varies with the board of affiliation.
Not only the board, but the quality of education in the schools also varies with the economic conditions of the school. For example, private schools that typically charge a higher fee provide better education and all-round development opportunities as compared to publically run schools. Requiring a common national curriculum ensures that every child gets equal opportunities in education, and limits the capitalist effect of money when it comes to schooling and education.
However, it makes sense to have a broadly uniform curriculum while also accomodating regional and cultural differences. Scientifically, it has been proven that a child's intellectual growth and grasping power is the maximum in his/her mother-tongue, because that is the language the child has been listening to and learning since a very young age. Teaching a child in an alien language also requires the child to learn the language first, thus slowing the intellectual growth till the time the new language has been learnt by the child.
For example, in a country as vast and as diverse as India, there are significant differences in the languages spoken by the people living in the various parts of the country. In India, every school has a compulsory local language as a subject alongwith English as another compulsory language subject. The compulsion of English resonates with the idea of having a common national curriculum while teaching the local language helps the child adjust well in his/her surroundings and learn things quickly.
In conclusion, it can be said, with certain reservations, that all the schools of a nation should require its students to study broadly the same national curriculum until they enter college. However, the curriculum should also accommodate cultural differences of the people living in the nation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1771.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 331.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35045317221 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94305721712 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501510574018 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6299260072 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.230769231 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4615384615 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204954517716 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0884915993953 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119607054743 0.0758088955206 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144534781825 0.150359130593 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129202925485 0.0667264976115 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.