a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
The topic raises a controversial issue whether a nation should require all its students to study the same curriculum until they enter college. Indisputably, this will lead to a uniform and fair education system for all and could be prefered by the authorities too. Nevertheless, it will create a confusing situation for the students as they would feel that they are being taught superfluous subjects which do not interest them. Thus, I generally agree that the same curriculum should be mandatory for all the students in the nation until they enter college.
First of all, having a standrad national curriculum will ensure a common marking and grading system for all. I would like to point out that this will reduce the work of the administration and would also help to evaluate students on a common platform. To illustrate, let us looks at the example of a student getting 90% marks in a state board examination with the student getting the same score in the national board examintaion. Now, the curriculul and syllabus for the examintaions were different and so was the scoring criteria. In such situations, it seems like we are comparing apples with oranges which does not make any sense and thus we do not have a clear winner.
Furthermore, it would be easier for the administration to include new subjects or topics in the curriculum. For eg., to create awareness about the environment and the effects on it, the government can add a new topic which would be taught to the whole nation and it would be easier to incorporate it in the curriculum. In addition to this, it will be easier for the government to make study material available to rustic areas with limited sources of education and they will be studying the same courses so that they could compete with the other students of the nation.
Admittedly the students in this situation would feel that they are being taught subjects that they do not require but such cases can be discussed with the controlling authority and a collabarative decision can be made. However this would be limited to very specific cases and would not disrupt the basis of the system. Hence, this argument does not consitute a sufficent support to claim that the curriculum should not be standardised.
In conclusion, although some students might feel that this would not be the best idea to go with, it can be seen with the abovementioned arguments that making the curriculum standardised for all the nation's students would actually work in their favour. The ease in conduct for the administration, correct evaluation of the students and increase in the reach of education would be a great achievement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ould also help to evaluate students on a common platform. To illustrate, let us l...
^^
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...d a collabarative decision can be made. However this would be limited to very specific ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, thus, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 28.0 12.4196629213 225% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2206.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 448.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92410714286 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83708079255 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455357142857 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 675.9 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6909610563 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.764705882 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3529411765 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.70588235294 5.21951772744 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347884129623 0.243740707755 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14468034629 0.0831039109588 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.192366902444 0.0758088955206 254% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221732690466 0.150359130593 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.167235864134 0.0667264976115 251% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.