The chart below gives information about science qualifications held by people in two countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph shown here depicts the comparison between Malaysia and Singapore in terms of science qualifications.
It is seen that both the countries have equally qualified Masters personnel whereas Singapore has almost twice as bachelor graduates as Malaysia which can be interpreted as their disinterest in further research in the field. Students who take science as their school leaving exams are 5% more in Malaysia. the same trend can be seen for the people who do not have any qualification for science in the two countries. however, it can be observed that more than half of the population for the both the countries are do not have any science qualification.
The overall trend shows that though there are more students who take science exams at the end of their school in Malaysia, they don't actually go for further studies in the subject. On the contrary although the quantity is lesser for the same in Singapore, they equal Malaysia with the same number of Masters qualified people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... leaving exams are 5% more in Malaysia. the same trend can be seen for the people w...
^^^
Line 3, column 417, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ation for science in the two countries. however, it can be observed that more than half...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 514, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'done'.
Suggestion: done
...pulation for the both the countries are do not have any science qualification. ...
^^
Line 5, column 129, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e end of their school in Malaysia, they dont actually go for further studies in the ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, however, if, so, whereas, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00602409639 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71176021979 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548192771084 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9721001947 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.714285714 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0737448228863 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420216674647 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460146398498 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0530832280326 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026633644814 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.